In contemporary society, protected areas are increasingly expected to justify their existence through

the services that they provide to society. Protected areas offer many important cultural services, but appraisal

of these nonmaterial benefits has generally proven difficult and most studies have focused on single case stud-

ies. Data on tourist numbers across multiple camps and protected areas provide a tractable and previously

unexploited case study for better understanding the economic sustainability of cultural service provision and

the relevance of potentially confounding variables (e.g., location and infrastructure) for park sustainability. We

used redundancy analysis and linear models to relate a 5-yr monthly data set (2007–2012) of tourist numbers

and tourism-derived income in all camps in South African national parks to a set of largely GIS-derived, deter-

minant attributes that captured key elements of location, biodiversity, infrastructure, and accommodation cost

at a camp level. Our analysis suggests that the degree to which cultural services can be converted into revenue

for conservation is strongly contingent on infrastructure, location, and the business model that the park adopts.

When considered alone, ecological attributes explained 14.2% and 3% of day and overnight visitation rates,

respectively. In contrast, models that considered ecosystems in combination with other elements could explain

53% and 67% of variation. Linear models confirmed the existence of complex interactions between groups of

variables and highlighted individual covariates that affected visitation rates. Significant variables included

ecological features that provided aesthetic services, number of water bodies, elevation, available units, unit

costs, and distance to the coast, airports, and other national parks. Taken in context our results suggest that it

may be simpler than expected to make predictions about the potential future economic viability of protected

areas under alternative models of management, illustrate how ecological variables may represent the “sup-

ply” side in cultural services, and highlight the complex interplay between ecological and built infrastructure.

Encouragingly, this in turn suggests that relatively small, targeted investments in infrastructure could lead to

disproportionate increases in tourist visitation rates and hence in increased revenue for conservation.

Link of full paper is under.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.1207/pdf

i will recommend this book

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281447684_AGRI_TOURISM_FARM_FARM_STAY