When most people think of ethics (or morals), they think of rules for distinguishing between right and wrong. The most common way of defining "ethics" is norms for conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Some of the important ethical principals which must be followed by a good researcher are:

1. Honesty and Objectivity

2. Integrity and Carefulness

3. Openness and Respect for Intellectual Property

4. Confidentiality and Responsible Publication

5. Responsible Mentoring and Respect for colleagues

6. Social Responsibility and Non-Discrimination

7. Competence and Legality

Scientific research must be dedicated towards detecting the truth, concerning an existing problem. Ethics, in this respect, means to serve truth and not the monetary incentive alone. In practice, it is about the objective of what dominates research: truth vs. power structure. Of course, this process comes in intersections and gradual stages.

Look at the following file

Dealing with other researchers and journal editors and reviewers.

Please have a look at this useful RG link.

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_are_ethics_of_scientific_research_akhlaqyat_albhth_allmy

The goal of scientific research is to reach new facts and results that other researchers have not reached. And that any scientific achievement does not come from nothing but depends on the findings of other researchers in the field of research.

Therefore, scientific honesty requires reference to efforts that paved the way for new results, otherwise it is considered theft.

When most people think of ethics (or morals), they think of rules for distinguishing between right and wrong. The most common way of defining "ethics" is norms for conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable behavior. Some of the important ethical principals which must be followed by a good researcher are:

1. Honesty and Objectivity

2. Integrity and Carefulness

3. Openness and Respect for Intellectual Property

4. Confidentiality and Responsible Publication

5. Responsible Mentoring and Respect for colleagues

6. Social Responsibility and Non-Discrimination

7. Competence and Legality

I think one of an important of the ethics of scientific research is the true which is reflect all the results of research on it .

The ethics is to report results as accurately as possible without due influence from other worldly forces

The ethical dilemmas/challenges commonly observed could be classified as authorship and editorial issues. The author issues commonly encountered are authorship criteria failure, gift or ghost authorship, duplicate submission, redundant publication, duplicate publication, plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication of data. The commonly encountered editor issues are poorly managed peer review, expeditiousness, financial benefits, deals with alleged scientific misconduct, confidentiality, and conflict of interest. Journal editors are expected to be cognizant of the various international guidelines that guide editing, conducting, and reporting of research. Few international guidelines to mention are Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), Council of International Organizations for Medical Sciences, World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), World Medical Association, etc.

I recommend to consult the parper:

Ethics of scientific publication: DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.190811

Should be genuine

Must be innovative

Able to understand,

Analyse and apply

Capable to extend

and appreciable

Interesting question. I do agree with Dr Malesh Kumar

It is an ethics that extends:

1. from the lab to the questionnaire study,

2. from the inputters of the data to the analyyzers of that data,

3. from the analyzers of data to the interpretors of that data,

4. from the writers of the manuscript to the journal editors,

5. from rejection to acceptance.

Dennis

Dennis Mazur

Hi,

"What is the ethics of scientific research?

What is the ethics of scientific research, is it the ethical behavior suitable for the researcher in dealing with other researchers or is the scientific secretariat."

I think that as long as a scientific research deals with probability, error and uncertainty, the concept of ethics is not applicable. Either you do it right or you do it wrong.

Regarding the researcher, an ethical behavior is that obeying what Mahesh already mentioned. The problem is that morals is not the same to everyone.

Ethics x Morals What are they?

https://www.diffen.com/difference/Ethics_vs_Morals

Ethics

The rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions or a particular group or culture.

Morals

Principles or habits with respect to right or wrong conduct. While morals also prescribe dos and don'ts, morality is ultimately a personal compass of right and wrong.

I utterly agree with the submissions of Drs. Mahesh Kumar and Stephen I. Ternyik.

Ethics in scientific research is the pursuance of the study of a phenomena with all sincerity, truth and a high sense of objectivity with no room for falsification of data or findings because of any influence (political/monetary etc.).

In rigorous scientific research that clings to the esteemed ethics, the study must be replicable by other scholars who would register the same or close to the same findings from the study as the researcher.

The rigor of any scientific research is judged based on how meticulous a researcher followed the ethics of integrity, truth and objectivity in all the facets of the work (problem statement, literature survey, methods, findings/results, interpretations and analysis, conclusions and recommendations).

Ethics alludes to moral rules that recognize what is right and wrong. Moral is an alarm in scientific research. Moral issues come up as to humanity, honesty and discussion. A moral issue of humankind can incorporate doing what is gainful to the researcher while hurting different organisms.

The researcher's characteristics differ from the ethics of scientific research,

Ethics refers to moral guidelines that distinguish what is right and wrong. *Ethical scientific research must be conducted in a manner that makes it beneficial rather than harmful to us, other organisms, and our earth *standards of methods and process address the design, procedures, data analysis, interpretation, and reporting of research efforts.

*standards of topics and findings address the use of human and animal subjects in research and the ethical implications of certain research findings.

these ethical standards help guide scientific research and ensure that research efforts (and researchers) abide by several core principles (Resnik, 1993), including:

• Honesty in reporting of scientific data.
• Careful and Independent analysis of scientific results to avoid error and interpretation of results that is based on data and not on the influence of external sources
• Open sharing of methods, data, and interpretations through publication and presentation;
• Sufficient validation of results through replication and collaboration with peers.
• Proper crediting of sources of information, data, and ideas.
• Moral obligations to society in general, and, in some disciplines, responsibility in weighing the rights of human and animal subjects.

https://sites.google.com/site/washtenawjustice/ethics/ethics-in-scientific-research

http://www.apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx

I feel in an Ethics in scientific research, the ground rules must be clear. Good communication skills play a key important role and need to be addressed.

Regards

Dr. Kamath Madhusudhana

I would say that honestity and objectivity above all

Dear @Nihad, you have already received fine responses regarding the scientific research's ethics.

We should be all aware of the existence of COPE.

COPE is committed to educate and support editors, publishers and those involved in publication ethics with the aim of moving the culture of publishing towards one where ethical practices becomes the norm, part of the publishing culture. Our approach is firmly in the direction of influencing through education, resources and support of our members alongside the fostering of professional debate in the wider community. ..

"Core practices are the policies and practices journals and publishers need, to reach the highest standards in publication ethics. We include cases with advice, guidance for day-to-day practice, education modules and events on topical issues, to support journals and publishers fulfil their policies.

• 1. Allegations of misconduct
• 2. Authorship and contributorship
• 3. Complaints and appeals
• 4. Conflicts of interest / Competing interests
• 5. Data and reproducibility
• 6. Ethical oversight
• 7. Intellectual property
• 8. Journal management
• 9. Peer review processes
• 10. Post-publication discussions and corrections..."

https://publicationethics.org/

Very nice question dear,

To add one more point:

Ethics is a code of conduct which is analyzed in terms of costs and benefits to research participants/subjects. Costs are harms, discomforts, distress, frustration and the like that subjects may absorb as the result of their participation in a study. In general, the costs need to be minimum and the benefits ought to be maximum!

Good Luck,

Berhanu

Following

Is to work with sincerity and seriousness away from cheating, bias and lying simplistic expression

he ethic of scientific research requires respect for the rights, opinions and dignity of others, whether they are research colleagues, research participants or research participants. The principles of research ethics generally adopt the values ​​of affirmative action and avoidance of harm. These values ​​must be my focus Ethical Considerations During the research process, there are some considerations for ethical conduct that include the following:

- Truthfulness

The results of your search must be truthfully transmitted, be honest about what you convey, and not complement any incomplete or incomplete information based on what you think has happened.

- Experience (Expertise)

The work you do in the research should be appropriate to your level of expertise and training. First, prepare the initial work and then try to understand the theory carefully before applying the concepts or procedures.

- Safety (Safety)

Do not expose yourself to physical or moral hazard, take precautions in all experiments, and do not attempt to carry out your research in potentially hazardous geological, aerospace, social or chemical environments. The safety of the target is also important.

- Trust

Try to build a trust relationship with those you work with.

- Consent

Always make sure you have prior approval from those you wish to work with during the research period.

- Withdrawal

People have the right to withdraw from school at any time, and always remember that participants are often volunteers and must be treated with respect.

- Digital Recording

Do not record sounds, take pictures or shoot video without the consent of the target audience.

- Feedback

If you can give feedback to your target audience, then you may not be able to provide participants with the full report.

- False Hope

Do not make your target audience think that things will change because of your search or project.

- Taking into account the feelings of others

Some people may be more likely to feel defeat or surrender due to age, illness, or inability to understand or express themselves.

- Exploitation of positions

Do not use the positions in favor of your search; do not interpret what others are saying or indirectly saying so as to serve your search.

- Anonymity