Is there any distinct definition on why and how muscular diseases are categorized either as dystrophies or myopathies? Does the name classify a distinct general characteristic or is it only a synonym that is used interchangably?
Olivier's answer above is formally correct. There are, however, a some marginal diseases, like myotonic dystrophy, where muscle degeneration/regeneration is not a major feature.
the very difference between "myopathy and myopatic dystrophy is the NECROSIS of muscular fibers in this last one; it's enough to apply one ematossilyn colour or Gomory's modified color to show the fundamental difference on muscular biopsies. Today the channelmyopathies or the membrane 's proteins defects don't change these cardinal points.
Though myopathy is a term indeed used in general for muscle disease, this is an oversimplification and the two terms should be used separately. The best example is the different disease groups of inherited/congenital muscle dystrophies and inherited/congenital myopathies, with all four groups consisting of different disorders. The very point of dichotomy between muscle dystrophies and myopathies (apart from dystrophic/necrotic features (usually) not present in myopathies) is that dystrophies are linked to (genetic) alterations in membrane/structural elements, whereas myopathies are linked to alterations in contractile elements of the muscle fibers. See: Semin Neurol. 2008 Apr;28(2):250-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1062269
There is a danger here of arguing about definitions when what matters from a scientific viewpoint is mechanisms. The term myopathy, can be applied to any muscle disease. The term dystrophy was classically applied by pathologists to the subset of inherited myopathies in which muscle tissue destruction was a major feature. For some reason myotonic dystrophy became aberrantly included in this category. Myositides contain a myonecrotic element but were not thought to be genet although it is becoming realized that there may be a genetic element to some of them. We must revise our taxonomy with increasing knowledge although some people find this inconvenient.