My research team of four is working out some logistics for a study using grounded theory methodology from a constructivist framework. Currently, we are practicing applying initial codes to mock interviews. We intend to code separately (three of us are coding) and then we will come together to evaluate the codes and discuss the best fitting code given the statement provided by the participant. We want to end up with a single document containing our agreed upon codes (initial codes). We don't think NVivo will work the best given the issues people have around merging NVivo files but we are open to it. Our best option right now is to code on separate word docs, then combine the documents using the "combine documents" function in word. Does anyone have any insight or tools on this?
Given the typical length and diverse wording of initial (open) codes, I don't see much point in trying to merge your several files. Instead, I would create a single, new "reference" file and put your merged/consolidated codes into it
Dear Webster,
I have used Atlas ti web version for all my qualitative projects as of now, and seems fine.
To combine the initial codes from separate team members in a Grounded Theory study using Atlas.ti, first, make sure everyone has coded independently using consistent criteria. Then, you can use Atlas.ti’s shared project feature to bring all the codes together and check for any overlaps or differences. The software helps you compare and merge code families. It’s important to meet as a team to discuss any discrepancies in coding to make sure you’re all on the same page. Afterward, you can collectively refine and combine these codes into themes that will help build the theory.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Higher Education
- Universities