We want to expose the Rats with the electromagnetic field of cell phones (900 MHz) and then we will measure some proteins in their blood plasma.
1- Is it better to use Jammers or cell phone?
2- which parameters should be take into account?
any one had the experience which duration, distance, and frequencies is better to evaluate the changes blood plasma?
1- studey the effect of mobile radition to blood content
2- change the distance withe intensity of radition
3- use 900MHz it is beeter
I have no experience in laboratory exposure tests, however I'm often asked to discuss the relevance of such studies. Therefore I'm going to suggest what should be avoided, as, for example, here
> http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(17)30052-4/fulltext
some important information is lacking
The relevant parameter is the SAR so this is to be assessed, in order to make comparisons with human exposure.
The bare field strenght or power densities are not enough since rats are rather smaller than humans.
In western Europe 900 MHz is going to leave place to 1,8 GHz and 2,4 GHz.
The latter is a resonance of water molecule, and is the frequency used in microwave ovens, therefore I think these two bands are worth to be considered as well
Thank you all.
We could examine different frequencies like 900 and 2400 MHz. The design of this study mentioned by Mr. Frigerio could be helpful.
please read this paper under the title
The Effect of Cellphone Radiation on Hematological Blood Cell Factors In BALB/C Mice
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Vol. 13, No. 1, March 2016, 58-64
with best regard
Dear Abdurrahman Khaleel Suleiman
Thank you for your response. I think this article could be helpful:
The Effect of Cellphone Radiation on Hematological Blood Cell Factors In BALB/C Mice
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Electromagnetics
- Electromagnetic Fields