My goal is to use the short-range remote sensing technique (drone) to study tree species in deciduous forests. Overlap and flight altitude play a key role in this. Do you have the right overlap and height to improve the results?
Hi, this is one paragraph I wrote that may help you. Additional references are at the end.
"The imagery should be acquired in systematic flight-lines with an approximate 20% to 30% overlap in homogeneous areas as recommended (Meinen and Robinson 2020) and above 70% overlap in heterogeneous areas as recommended by (Clapuyt et al. 2017) following previously defined ground control points (GCPs) as recommended by (Agüera-Vega, Carvajal-Ramírez, and Martínez-Carricondo 2017; Cabreira, Brisolara, and Ferreira Paulo 2019) while capturing downward-facing photographs."
If I have to be extremely general I would recommend a 50-60 m flight height. This is strongly dependent on the camera less angle and the area you want to cover.
References
Agüera-Vega, Francisco, Fernando Carvajal-Ramírez, and Patricio Martínez-Carricondo. 2017. “Accuracy of Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry.” Journal of Surveying Engineering 143(2): 04016025.
Cabreira, Tauã M., Lisane B. Brisolara, and R. Ferreira Paulo. 2019. 3 Drones Survey on Coverage Path Planning with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.
Clapuyt, François, Veerle Vanacker, Fritz Schlunegger, and Kristof Van Oost. 2017. “Unravelling Earth Flow Dynamics with 3-D Time Series Derived from UAV-SfM Models.” Earth Surface Dynamics 5(4): 791–806.
Meinen, Benjamin U., and Derek T. Robinson. 2020. “Mapping Erosion and Deposition in an Agricultural Landscape: Optimization of UAV Image Acquisition Schemes for SfM-MVS.” Remote Sensing of Environment 239(January): 111666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.111666.
O’Connor, James, Mike J. Smith, and Mike R. James. 2017. “Cameras and Settings for Aerial Surveys in the Geosciences: Optimising Image Data.” Progress in Physical Geography 41(3): 325–44.
Your flight height will be less than 50m. for the greater resolution and accuracy and overlapping percentage more than 60% is well enough to identify the objects properly.
I think keep in your mind if you increase height more than 50m then it will create problem for overlapping.
I have images taken with an eBee drone with a flight altitude of 110 meters and 60% overlap. The processing results were not satisfactory to me and the ortho became complicated when zooming.
Yes. The problem should be the high altitude of the flight.