The accuracy of thermal conductivity data obtained from literature versus the results of a Thermal Conductivity Scan (TCS) can vary based on several factors. Both sources of data have their advantages and limitations.

Literature Data:

• Advantages: Literature data can provide a broad overview of thermal conductivity values for various rock types. They are often based on extensive research and can cover a wide range of conditions.
• Limitations: Literature data may not accurately represent the specific rock sample you are working with. The values provided might be averages, ranges, or specific to certain conditions. The accuracy of literature data depends on the quality of the original research and the relevance of the conditions to your study.

Thermal Conductivity Scan (TCS) Results:

• Advantages: TCS involves direct measurement of thermal conductivity on actual rock samples under specific conditions. This can provide more accurate and relevant data for your specific study.
• Limitations: TCS results can be influenced by factors such as sample preparation, measurement techniques, and the specific conditions of the experiment. Proper calibration and careful experimental design are crucial for obtaining accurate results.