How do you perceive this IoK and do you think that it will be the future paradigm that will direct our life of multicultural, multiethnic, multireligious and multi-etc. nature?
Does it carry the potential for constructive reform? A reform that improves life of all and unites us, and unites us more.
I think an equally helpful question is to ask when IoK fail and why.
Integration of knowledge is different than synthesis of knowledge.
Not all knowledge fit or go together.
A reason for this is probably externalism of knowledge.
Good examples are paradigms or philosophy.
Knowledge is regarded as a primary source of value creation.Integration of Knowledge is the process of synthesizing multiple knowledge models into a common model. It focuses more on synthesizing the understanding of a given subject from different perspectives. It has also been studied as the process of incorporating new information into a body of existing knowledge with an interdisciplinary approach. Yes, it has the potential for constructive reform.
Thanks to both Brian Barnard and Md Nazirul Islam Sarker ,
But Brian Barnard could IoK be a new philosophy or paradigm that overcomes the externalism of knowledge and resolve issues of what fits or does not fit together?
Md Nazirul Islam Sarker how would you use IoK to synthesise, incorporate new/old information to a common model? and how to tackle the interdisciplinary multiple approaches? how to justify it?
Thanks to both in advance.
To overcome externalism of knowledge would mean to have perfect knowledge. By then you would not have differences too...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking