Interesting Tasnuva tabassum Maria question. Would be interested to know as well.

Discussed and defined in this pdf

Contingency leadership says that "one size doesn't fit all". One theory for leading people doesn't suit all situations.

So the leadership style you choose is contingent on the people who you need to lead, the organizational structure and resources, the goal you want to achieve and so many other factors that interact to achieve the organizational goals.

Dear Maria!

Contingency approach to management (not only to leadership as a part of management) says that there is no best approach to ALL cases. You should analyze the situation (e.g. internal and eternal environment) for the organization and only then hve to choose an appropriate method.

In case of leadership it means e.g. that you can use your charisma with one subordinate, but it will not work with another one

Kind regards, Pavlo

Tasnuva, although contingency theory does not limit itself only to leadership and the effectiveness of leadership styles but considers both internal and external contexts in which resources are used, there has been increasing recognition of the applicability of these aspects in Management in general. Therefore, it is fundamental that researchers who intend to make use of contingency theory also recognise the potential impact that a leader's personality type, the way they make use of available human and material resources could potentially determine the effectiveness or otherwise of their actions and behaviours. However, these aspects are also primarily influenced or 'contingent' on an evolving and dynamic internal and external sets of circumstances. In sum, flexibility of styles is crucial in resolving the challenges posed to organisational survival and sustainability especially by the external contexts within which organisations operate. Interesting discussion...

This is leadership in business that is based on situation. In other words, leadership activities are determined by different situations

I believe the essence of the Contingency Theory of leadership is that leaders are most effective when they make their behaviour/decision depending upon situational forces, including group member characteristics. We're all attributing to the same direction anyways but in different words.

The contingency theory of business leadership expresses that circumstances determine the method used to influence others. In situations of rebellion, crises and emergencies the authoritarian style requires, and in normal circumstances "democracy" may be the best.

Simply, good organization, without so cauitously

Es cómo el líder con sus colabores introduce, productos o servicios, posesiona la marca y genera valor para los socios de la empresa, solucionando las necesidades de la clientela en un mercado de turbulencia, caos, problemático, competitivo. por supuesto que el líder y su equipo conoce la data del mercado, para los cuales emplea planes con estrategias para lograr sus objeticos de colocar sus productos y permanecer en el mercado.

The contingency theory of leadership supposes that a leader's effectiveness is contingent on whether or not their leadership style suits a particular situation. According to this theory, an individual can be an effective leader in one circumstance and an ineffective leader in another one.

Suggest you search Google Scolar for ways it is defined, discussed, and applied. Theory informs practice, but theory isnt always contextually useful in its pure form.

Interesting Tasnuva tabassum Maria question. Would be interested to know as well.