Entrepreneurship is based on three fundamental pillars (innovation, proactivity, risk-taking), knowing that risk-taking is an ancient human behavior. Change in this world cannot occur without the possibility of failure, and initiating change with the potential for failure is precisely the concept of risk. Here, the following questions arise:

  • On what considerations are our evaluations of risk conditions based, and how do we avoid bias towards excessive optimism or excessive pessimism?
  • If risk-taking is the cause of all change, can we consider a preference for stable jobs a type of stagnation that does not drive the economy towards improvement?
  • Why do we glorify the experiences of the successful, while overlooking the experiences of those who failed, considering that their risk conditions were greater, as we seek to avoid failure before striving for success.
More Seddik Boudouda's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions