Dear Eduard Babulak ,

The simple difference is that human beings use their brain, ability to think, memory, while AI machines depend on the data given to them. As we all know that humans learn from past mistakes and intelligent ideas and intelligent attitudes lie at the basis of human intelligence.

While AI researchers are trying to replicate our mental functions, many people are scared that AI will replace them. Hundreds of jobs such as drivers, radiologists and cashiers are facing substitution with machines in the next 5 years. Who’s next? To get a better idea what is coming we need a better understanding in which domains AI is stronger than humans and vice-versa.

https://www.analyticssteps.com/blogs/7-differences-artificial-intelligence-ai-human-intelligence

https://becominghuman.ai/artificial-vs-natural-intelligence-82ccd056b212

Regards,

Shafagat

Despite the fact that machines are faster, more consistent and almost perfect, we can not deny that it all begins with the HUMAN and ends with the HUMAN, having said that, AI, Machines, computers etc all just help/aid humans. We, humans, are the ALPHA and OMEGA and everything else goes in between. I believe machines humans, while humans might not need machines.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361603624

Cherchez une femme!

To answer your question I initiated the following project:

https://www.academia.edu/95654320/Accessible_Learning_for_All

which require knowledge networks:

https://www.academia.edu/89399367/R%C3%A9seaux_de_connaissance

I am waiting for Emiliana Minenna who seemed to be interested in collaborating on such kind of projects which optimize the performance of AI.

[email protected]

and values ​​human input in a more meaningful way.

The keyword here is "learn". Humans have the ability to learn, adapt to changes, and create things. ANNs do NOT learn, they are just conditioned to execute a very specific task. ANNs do NOT adapt, they do NOT recognize changes in the pattern of input data. ANNs do NOT create anything, they just follow the task they work "trained" (not learned) to perform.

Dear Hegler Tissot,

I am afraid you didn't answer the proposed issue:

What is a missing link between the Artificial Intelligence and Natural Intelligence and why does Machine Learning require Human programmer to work?

yours

Amin, in other words, we need to rethink AI if we realy want to bring "intelligence" to machines.

Hegler Tissot

That's what I proposed to Emiliana:

"use technology to track and monitor the progress of  people receiving services, as well as to facilitate communication and collaboration between service providers."

Natural intelligence is inherent, while artificial intelligence behaves based on the training it is given.

Seyed Mehran Jafari We are not looking for definitions, we are looking for experimental implementation, otherwise researchgate shall loose its importance:

Conference Paper Track : Accessible Learning for All

Eduard Babulak I am worried with the confusion between AI and NI, my contribution is published in French:

"https://www.academia.edu/11326980/Philosophie_logique_informatique_Th%C3%A9orie_open_data_et_loi_de_lharmonie_par_Adib_Hathout_Pauline_Y%C3%A9t%C3%A9rian_Amin_Elsaleh Le plus visité par les chercheurs: "Dans le cadre de « Call for Papers | Mensonge et manipulation » nous présentons cette contribution sous forme de dialogue entre les 3 auteurs. L'analyse porte sur les thèmes suivants: Open Data et la manipulation des données , l'harmonie entre philosophie et pratique, l'informatique comme outil indispensable pour resserrer les liens entre logique et philosophie. Un des messages de cet essai est "sortir "la philosophie" de son isolement et lui faire jouer le rôle souverain de la découverte d'un horizon plus prometteur de "l'humain, humanitaire, humanitarisme"

with Google in case you are interested you may understand the

evolution of our society in a way that will lead us to unjustified

wars instead of evolving our natural intelligence with unexplored

abilities