What I understand so far is that the summary summarizes the work as well as the presentation of the research gap, and provides a perception of the sample, tools, and results.

The conclusion provides a perception of the problem, the contribution of the current study to closing the research gap, and then highlighting the results and limits. Then in a separate address, recommendations are displayed for future research, sometimes also borders in a separate address. which determines this university guide.

Can someone best explain what they should (and shouldn't) include in the abstract? Similarly in conclusion.

Many thanks.

Similar questions and discussions