According to Yangton and Yington Theory, any spinning particle with polarization shall have Wave Particle Duality such as photon and electron. Also according to Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory, any traveling particle with the capability of making contact interaction with the same particles in space will form a field such as graviton and electron. However, not all particles can be a wave or to form a field.
According to Yangton and Yington Theory, gravitational force is generated between two gravitons with side by side contact. Because of this reason, for two distance objects, a graviton particle must first escape from the parent object, then travel to the target object to make a side by side contact, such that the propagation of gravitational force can be fulfilled. This is called “Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory”.
Like a photon emitted from a heat source by absorbing thermal energy to overcome its energy of separation, graviton can also be emitted from an object by absorbing thermal energy to overcome its gravitational force. It is obvious that the amount of the gravitons (M) emitted from the parent object to the target object should be proportional to the total amount of gravitons in the parent object, as is proportional to the mass of the parent object (m1). Also according to the Inverse Square Law, the amount of the gravitons (M) emitted from the parent object to the target object should be inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r) between parent object and target object. Therefore,
M ∞ m1/r2
Furthermore, the total gravitational force (F) generated from side by side contact between the gravitons (M) emitted from the parent object to the target object should be proportional to both the amount of the gravitons (M) emitted from the parent object to the target object and the total amount of the gravitons on the target object which is proportional to the total mass of the target object (m2). Therefore,
F ∞ (m1/r2) m2
As a result, Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation can thus be represented as follows:
F = G (m1m2/r2)
Where G is the gravitational constant 6.674×1011 N m2kg-2.
Gravitational field is the summation of the graviton vectors (graviton with direction) generated from all the objects in the universe onto a point in space. Therefore, the gravitational field can be represented as follows:
Fg = G (∑ m/r2 S)
Where Fg is gravitational field, G is the gravitational constant 6.674×1011 N m2 kg-2, m is the mass of an object, r is the distance between the object and the unit mass, S is the unit vector in the same direction of the graviton vector generated by the object and ∑ is the summation of m/r2 S of all objects in the universe.
Furthermore, ∑ m/r2 S represents the summation of the graviton vectors emitted from all the objects in the universe onto a point based on Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory. With the linear relationship and the same directions between gravitational field and the summation of graviton vectors at any point in space, gravitational field can be considered as a “repercute” of the distribution of graviton vectors in space.
Similar to gravitational field, the electrical field is defined as the electron vectors applied from all charged particles in the universe onto a point in space. Therefore, based on Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory, electrical field can also be interpreted as a “repercute” of the distribution of electron vectors in space.
As a result, both the gravitational and electrical fields can be derived from Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory with a linear relationship to the distributions of graviton vectors and electron vectors respectively. Therefore, Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory can be considered as the foundation of Quantum Field Theory, Quantum Gravity Theory and Unified Field Theory.
The gravitation interaction is a limit interaction where there is any exchange of energy that's why it is universal.
See my theory: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Theory-of-Vacuum-Kouki/2ffdeef43fe1fc0cac0db3106a691817184efae5
QFT is still a rather simple view of what is happening in nature. the quantum field is nothing but an infinite ensemble of harmonic oscillators spreaded over space, hence a field. the quantum field describes by excitation and annihilation operators and modulation functions the ''particle'' by locally exciting this field of harmonic oscillators. it is still a very naive way of description. a fundamental problem with the field is, that the harmonic oscillators are infinitely close together. this leads to the problem of renormalization. the graviton as a quantum field leads to another problem. what happens to the ART interpretation of gravity, when the metric is no more a metric but a quantum field, an operator? when quantum mechanics prevails, the Loorentz light cone gets fuzzy due the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. Questions over questions. It is not that easy.
I struggle to make sense of the standard model of particle physics. First we were told that protons and neutrons were each made of three quarks and these quarks have an electric charge of +2/3 or - 1/3. All this without explaining the cause of electric charge.
Then along comes the latest story on a YouTube video that quarks are a big lie and it is all fields. A field for each particle in the standard model with the parameters for the 21 different fields being derived from experimental measurement. Getting a bit suspicious now.
Then we are told that the Higgs field gives mass to particles and explains this in a way that makes no sense to anyone. Anyway we all thought we understood mass after studying the General Theory of Relativity.
So I have given up on the standard model of particle physics and worked it all out for myself:
Data Prerecording of Conference Presentation on the Unification of Physics
Conference Paper THE UNIFICATION OF PHYSICS (Conference Paper)
Richard
Richard Lewis
Dear Richard:
In Standard Model and quantum field theory, the mass of a particle is the magnitude of the barrier in motion applied to the particle by Higgs Bosons that are generated from Higgs Field. However, what the Higgs Bosons and Higgs Field are and where they coming from remains mysteries. According to Yangton and Yington Theory, mass is the total amount of Wu’s Pairs in a particle which are bound together by string force. Therefore, a Higgs Boson can be considered as a particle composed of one single Wu’s Pair with a string force, and Higgs Field can be interpreted as the distribution of Higgs Bosons in space, or the distribution of string forces or Wu’s Pairs in space, or in other words, the distribution of mass in space.
Edward
Hinnerk Albert Richard Lewis
In general, a conceptual comparison between quantum field theory and Yangton and Yington Theory can be presented as follows:
A. Quantum Field Theory
Quantum Mechanics (QM) + Special Relativity (3 x 108 m/s) → Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) + Yang-Mills Theory → Standard Model
General Relativity + String Theory (Calabi-Yau Manifold + Quantum Field Theory (QFT)) → Quantum Gravity Theory (QGT) → Unified Field Theory (UFT)
B. Yangton & Yington Theory
Point Particle + Particle Radiation & Contact Interaction (PRCI) → Quantum Field Theory
String Particle + Particle Radiation & Contact Interaction (PRCI) → Quantum Gravity Theory (QGT) → Unified Field Theory (UFT)
In general, Wu’s Pairs and Yangton and Yington Theory could provide a particle model and physical picture for the interpretation of Quantum Field Theory, Quantum Gravity Theory and Unified Field Theory.
Edward
What is a quantum field? The quantum or bit field was first discovered when the photon showed particle or bit properties. In electromagnetic field theory, these photons were not bits but continuous waves as described by Maxwell so what's really happening. All oscillations are wave-like and Louis Debroglie showed the electron orbit was in phase with a wave-like structure. The quantum number "n" was born or was it. This "n" ultimately causes discontinuity across the field because only specific orbits can exist. One might assume this is not compatible with classical orbits which can have any value and is not restricted by an integral number.
Wave functions exist within classical systems and it is the most general wave function because "n" is a power on a wave amplitude. This means the field is still continuous. The photon in quantum mechanics is radiation associated with an oscillation shift or precession within the electromagnetic field. It is the same shift Mercury experiences as it orbits the Sun. The energy release associated with an electron orbital shift always appears discontinuous with respect the unshifted orbit. This does not mean the electron jumps, no more than a neutron star jumps through space. I proved this in my paper "Binary Precession solutions based on synchronized field coupling. It was published in the Indian Journal of Science and Technology so it did not get the press the nature paper below got seven years later
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/scientists-catch-a-quantum-jump-as-it-happens
This was a major discovery which should have ended much debate but people want to keep talking about fantastic physics which does not produce real technology. Gravitons is a part of fantastic physics because it does not exist.
The classical wave function I discovered shows "n" is actually the power of an amplitude. These amplitudes are detected as particles on an atomic level.
Jamahl Peavey
First of all, nobody said that QM or wave function are wrong. Secondly, we are talking about quantum field theory which is one level above QM.
De Broglie's Wave is only true for those particles that have wave characters such as those properties having cycling, oscillating or circulating effects on the positions. In other words, any particle which is polarized and has repeating process will have wave property, or more precisely, Wave Particle Duality. But not all particles are waves as De Broglie claimed.
However, in modern physics, it is claimed that all particles are fields, not a particle, nor a wave. They exist everywhere in the universe, and a single surge of the field can form a particle. Even more, theoretically, an unified field theory (one field) can be used to represent all different subatomic particles. It is hard to believe. But, based on "Yangton and Yington Theory" and "Particle Radiation and Contact Interaction Theory", the Quantum Field Theory and Unified Field Theory do make some senses.
Edward
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction