Israa Abdulnbi Nayyef , while AI systems have great capabilities in analysing and making decision based on precise data, I doubt if AI will replace human leaders and decision-makers entirely because: i. one major is that human leaders and decision makers must take responsibility for the consequences of decisions the make. They must consider the ethical implication and ensure that decisions align with organizational values and principles, but how do you hold an AI responsible for the decisions it is making? This question borders on the ethical standard for AI use which is a burning issue.

ii. complex decisions a lot of times require weighing competing priorities, considering multiple stakeholders and making tradeoffs. Human leaders are most times better equipped to handle these complex, high-stakes decision. This among several other reasons are why AI may not completely replace human leaders and decision-makers in the future in my opinion.

Israa Abdulnbi Nayyef As AI continues to advance and integrate into various domains. In my opinion, artificial intelligence, while incredibly powerful in processing vast amounts of data and identifying patterns beyond human capability, is unlikely to fully replace leaders and decision-makers. Instead, its role will likely remain as a supportive tool—one that enhances decision-making processes but cannot entirely replicate the nuanced judgment and ethical reasoning of humans.

Leadership requires not only the ability to analyze data but also the capacity to understand and respond to human emotions, cultural contexts, and unpredictable variables. While AI excels in logic and consistency, it lacks empathy, creativity, and the moral compass that often guide critical decisions. Leaders bring a human touch that inspires trust, collaboration, and long-term vision—qualities that AI, as a machine-driven entity, cannot authentically replicate.

That said, AI can significantly augment leadership by offering insights, improving efficiency, and reducing biases that stem from human error or prejudice. For example, in robotics, AI can assist in optimizing production lines, forecasting trends, or even managing complex systems autonomously, but these advancements still rely on human oversight to align technological progress with societal needs and values.

In essence, I believe the future will see a collaborative dynamic where AI serves as an indispensable ally, empowering leaders to make more informed and inclusive decisions rather than replacing them altogether. This interplay of human leadership and AI support could strike a balance that leverages the strengths of both.

I believe AI will enhance, not replace, our leaders. It still requires human oversight. It's similar to how computers and calculators were once feared to replace humans in the past, but instead, they improved their work and made it more efficient. Read our study on AI:

Policy guidelines and recommendations on Al use in teaching and learning: A meta-synthesis study (Scopus Q1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101221

That depends on whether the AI ​​is willing to wear a suit and tie and whether the AI ​​agrees to define itself as male.

AI has been a game-changer for many industries, providing new tools to parse data, forecast results, and streamline operations. The debate about whether AI can fill the shoes of leaders and decision-makers raises profound issues that our judgment, ethical standards, and the ability to project a vision of the future for humanity go way beyond. Logical analysis alone is not why leaders and decision-makers make the decisions they do; they think with empathy, foresight and adaptability. They make decisions through values, cultural considerations, and long-term vision, something that even the most advanced AI would not replicate from our human experience.

Because AI does great in implementing complex workings and sharing insights based on past and present parallel data, it serves as a tremendous auxiliary to help in decision-making. It can spot trends, flag threats and recommend the best courses of action faster than any human. But leadership inherently features uncertainty — and moral dilemmas that often can’t be answered in black and white. Such decisions need the capacity to evaluate intangible factors such as emotional resonance, social impact and ethical implications, spheres of activity at which AI is still fundamentally limited.

AI will undoubtedly evolve in leadership and decision-making, but it's an augmentation rather than a replacement. While AI provides data-driven insights and efficiencies, it cannot understand the nuance of human relationships and society itself. Leadership is not just about decision-making; it is also about motivating individuals, establishing trust, and maintaining cooperation—things that can only be derived from human experiences and interactions.

The occupational shift towards data infusion in leadership pays dividends when the heads of businesses use that data wisely — which AI increasingly enables but does not (and can never) remove from the paradigm. Those who treat AI as an ally will be in a winning position, weaving the art of the human mind with tactical millisecond wizardry of technology. AI will, without a doubt, have an ever-increasing influence on strategy formulation and decision-making in the future. Still, at least when it comes to the heart of leadership, there is nothing machines can replicate.