I am observing that some people (or bots?) are posting more and more answers which obviously are generated by AI chatbots.
As these answers IMHO reflect the stupidity of the Internet (that what AIs are trained with) and are lacking scientific ethics, this will deteriorate and eventually kill platforms like Research gate. If I want the answer of an AI, I will ask the AI directly, whereas in the cases here, people do not credit the AI that has delivered the answer, which IMHO is scientific fraud and plagiarism. Research Gate apparently does not care.
What do you think?
Yes, I agree. It’s pretty obvious when you have an AI generated answer. I just ignore those posts. You have to wonder what people gain from pretending they know the answer to a question, when it is evident that they don’t. I want to hear from someone with actual experience, which often has a depth to it that AI completely misses.
I completely agree. People asserting knowledge that they are unable to provide the formal references to are just mimicking real knowledge. AI apps such as ChatGPT are basically a neural network program indexing a huge amount of data as only neural networks can index data, that can be retrieved practically instantly on any set of entry criteria, that the neural network then automatically correlates as a function of the reference frame inherent in the questions asked, and makes available at its output layer.
It is obviously not set up to provide any reference to the sources of the data stored in its data bank. Without providing any of the required and confirmed formal references, AI apps such as ChatGPT end up being just a huge urban legends repository.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Modeling