In today's complex academic landscape, determining a good journal involves considering multiple factors that go beyond traditional metrics, particularly given the rise of predatory journals and the proliferation of questionable practices in publishing.

Are traditional metrics like Impact Factor still relevant indicators of a journal's quality? What other metrics could be considered? How do we distinguish the good from the not-so-bad journals? What criteria should guide our assessment? I believe these questions are even more demanding for young/early-career researchers.

I would be interested to hear some honest opinions based on your experience and interaction with the academic publishing system.

Similar questions and discussions