With example to stimulate research impetus rather than research grants, this thread will evaluate the basis of the spark that differentiates the plebeian from the sparkling wisdom that makes a major difference and a name in history.
We begin with Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck !!!
What are the requisites to make a mark in science?
" I do uphill skiing. I don't do downhill skiing. I think that is for nerd amateurs" -- Judah Friendlander.
When the concept and the determination is overwhelming, the results naturally would be out of this world, even if rhetorical.
I am encouraged by Slavoljub to place the most important lines of my major invited state-of-the-art and futuristic Commentary article to be published in Future Neurology in August 2019--the first major synthesis in neuroscience since last 2 millennia as well as the last 100 years:
"Every research question has a different approach. True progress in science requires the ability to grapple with the immeasurable, the daring to view phenomenology differently, to give birth to and maintain a disquieting but penetrating dys-synchrony, to confront and not be overawed by history or consensus, to sustain searing self-criticism, and to carry curiosity and imagination to a defensible and generalizable conclusion."
In some era, in some generation, there will be an individual who will be inspired by these words.
ORCID.org 0000-0002-6770-5916
New Delhi, 23 April, 2019
- Badges
- Science topic