Wolf, Ernest S. “Psychoanalytic Psychology of the Self and Literature.” New Literary History, vol. 12, no. 1, 1980, pp. 41–60. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/468804. Accessed 18 June 2021.
Michael Uebel Dear Professor Uebel, thank you! Both of those publications seem very interesting; Layton's article has been written with meticulous care and precision.
I appreciate your answering the question with meticulous care and I want to thank you for sharing your perspective. I could draw on different sources to say why I agree with you; however, instead of showing my pompous side today, I'll just go with Chandler: Could you BE any more accurate?
I do believe that Kohut has been misread in many sources in the case of higher education as well as his notion of empathy. And yes, erudition and contemplation can be therapeutic; that's actually brilliant for research.
If you ever had any unconventional ideas or without-source insights, I'd love to know about them. I actually did not question your theory, I pondered it. Conventional in-the-box theoretical thinking is not always the answer.