It seems that sonic-verbal & visual-textual communication are processed differently, but also that it depends on the recipient's neurolinguistic & psychosocial conditioning, and what language is used.

If you meet someone who speaks another language that you do not understand, you may not just miss what is being said but what is being perceived. Prof of Lancaster University works in areas of experimental psycholinguistics, cognitive linguistics, bilingual cognition, linguistic and cultural relativity, first, second, and additional language learning—all of which indicate that language learning today is being studied and measured by scientists in ways that go beyond handling vocabulary and sentence structure. Most of us intend to apply words that are radically equal to the words how we formulate in their regional language, But that is the reason it taps Mother Tongue Influence. because every language has its own conditions. when we intend to formulate words with the same meaning but in different sentence formations. Psychological that's how we got used to learning a new language.

The main questions that guide his research mesh language learning with human cognition:

1. To what extent do speakers with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds think and perceive the world differently?

2. To what extent does additional language learning transform the way we perceive the world? A paper authored by him and other researchers from the UK, Sweden, and Germany has been published in the peer-reviewed journal Psychological Science.

"Two Languages, Two Minds:

Flexible Cognitive Processing Driven by Language of Operation" is a step forward in discussing how the language that a person is using may change the way that person sees what's around— thought processes included. This is not such a radical idea. The authors noted the observation from Charlemagne, King of the Franks and crowned as Emperor of the Romans: to speak another language is to possess another soul.

What does all this "endpoint" talk mean? Nicholas Wailer, in News From Science, explained endpoints. "German speakers tend to specify the beginnings, middles, and ends of events, but English speakers often leave out the endpoints and focus on the action. Looking at the same scene, for example, German speakers might say, 'A man leaves the house and walks to the store,' whereas an English speaker would just say, 'A man is walking.'" As important, bilingual speakers appeared to switch between perspectives "based on the language most active in their minds," wrote Wailer. If speakers of two languages put different emphasis on actions and consequences, then bilinguals stand to get the best of more than one world view; two languages may result in more flexible thinking.

Wailer illustrated this point quite clearly: Where did the thief go? Ask the question in German and you may get a more accurate reply. How did she get away? You may want to use English for that one.

Explore further: How Dutch and German youth use English online to gain insight into their national ideologies

The major discovery was that the brain cares whether or not the grammatical properties of the new language (in this case, word order) resemble the grammatical properties of your native language. If they are similar, your brain uses its own grammar in learning the new language. And if the word order of the new language differs from your mother tongue, your brain needs to build a new grammatical repertoire. For the first time, researchers have shown that it helps the brain if it can reuse characteristics of our mother tongue when learning a new language.

When the unfamiliar word orders were repeated, brain activation increased within regions of the brain network known to be involved for your native language. Lead author of the study Kirsten Weber proposes, "The enhanced activity might reflect a brain mechanism to build and strengthen a neural network to process novel word order regularities." When the familiar word order was repeated, brain activation decreased in language-related regions. "That we found suppressed activation, on the other hand, supports our ideas that a known structure in a novel language quickly behaves like a structure in your native language. Processing a known structure is easier for the brain the second time around. As a whole, our study shows that we seem to use the same brain areas for native and new language structures and that Aliens was in the process of being integrated into the participants existing language brain networks."

Fillmore's Case-Model Grammar is driven more by semantics than by syntax. Check out this link:

Thank you so much, Mr.Nilsen, I just had an overview, it perturbs the logic succinctly.