I'm interested to find out what other reviewers' experiences/knowledge are with reviewing qualitative research.
What is your background in qualitative research? What advice can you give researchers when preparing their qualitative manuscripts?
A survey has also been created if you wish to contribute your insights to an academic report.
https://bit.ly/3rU1u0n
I am novice researcher and biggener at this moment. How and why we conduct qualitative research? (See contents at the end)
What problem which we insight? to leave a mark or solve a problem of universe. Qualitative case study method in which I am interested, with qualitative Reseach design. Qualitative philosophy is traced through interpretative or constructivist perspective. Subjectivity is ultimate objective to construct the reality within view point of participants subjects. It's the beauty of qualitative research that has great flexibility and provide a big opportunity to researchers who are inending to conduct Reseach on a problem or phenomena through multiple and diverse methods.
Important faces and for manuscript.
Reseach questions
Objectives
Reseach Design
Reseach Methods//Multiple
Analysis
I do reviewing in qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods and my main advice in all those areas concerns the literature review. Too often, new authors write literature reviews in formats that would be more appropriate for a thesis, rather than an article. It is important to begin with the recognition that your reviewers (and most of your readers) will already be familiar with your field, so your job is to convince them that your work will add to that field -- not to tell them things they already know about the content of field. In other words, you are not trying to demonstrate your level of knowledge about a field (as in a thesis); instead, you want to use that knowledge to show how your work will contribute to important issues in that field.
More specifically, you should begin with a strong problem statement (or solid list of research questions). Next, you should organize your literature review around that problem statement -- why is what you doing important and how will help advance the field?
One clear signal that your literature review needs revision is if it is too long. The test I suggest is that it should be considerably shorter than your Results section. The results are what will interest reviewers (and readers) the most. They want to know what you have learned. So convince them that you are studying is important, and then tell them about your findings in that regard.
I have not personally reviewed any qualitative manuscripts. However, some journals have specifics they would like reported in their manuscript which could help you prepare. Also, looking at recent publications in your journal of choice and published articles in your area of interest could help. Some of what is acceptable depends on the reviewers that are assigned to your manuscript as well.
Hello Salome, in my experience I recommend thematic analysis as a qualitative analysis technique. The thematic analysis has not allowed to know in depth the motivation of students in mathematics subjects:
Article MOTIVACIONES Y DESMOTIVACIONES DE ESTUDIANTES DE POSTGRADO E...
Article Experiencias Desmotivacionales y Motivacionales de Estudiant...
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology
- Research Methodology
- Qualitative Research