Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

What eco-innovation can be used in the future to protect the environment and biodiversity?

Innovations in energy technologies are being developed, technologies for renewable energy sources, electromobility, waste segregation, purification of contaminated water in rivers, ecological material innovations, eg replacement of plastic packaging for biodegradable materials, etc. are developed and improved.

All this constitutes an element of systemic sustainable pro-ecological economic development based on the concept of green economy.

Thanks to the dissemination of systemic sustainable ecological development in the future, it will be possible to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate and increase the scale of environmental protection and biodiversity.

Dissemination of systemic sustainable ecological development in the near future can save the planet Earth, many species of plants, animals and people from destruction, which may occur at the end of the 21st century, if the above-mentioned pro-ecological reforms are not introduced universally, globally, ie in all countries.

Do you agree with my opinion?

In connection with the above, I would like to ask you:

According to you, which eco-innovations are the most important for future protection of the environment and biodiversity?

Which ecological innovations do you think should be developed universally and to the greatest extent possible?

Please reply

Best wishes

I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

Should the dimension and scope of ecological knowledge in contemporary education and schooling systems be increased in the context of the growing problems of the modern world?

Contemporary XXI century is, among other things, the age of national and globally recognized growing problems regarding environmental protection, ecology, protection of biodiversity, ecosystems and species of various life threatened by extinction, growing risk of climatic cataclysms associated with the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth, exhausting some categories of resources necessary for development modern industries, the need for energy transformation, conversion of classic sources of energy based on minerals to renewable, ecological energy sources. In view of the above, the question becomes more and more relevant: Should the dimension and scope of ecological knowledge in contemporary education and schooling systems be increased in the context of the growing problems of the modern world?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

In addition, I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

What do you need to do to limit the devastation of the Amazon rain forest?

The Amazon rainforest is the largest complex of the natural forest ecosystem producing 60% oxygen on Earth, these are the lungs of the planet Earth.

In addition, it is a natural complex of forest ecosystem with rich biodiversity.

In these Amazonian ecosystems there are still many, millions of species of flora and fauna that have not yet been fully discovered or described.

The scale of felling and thinning stands in the Amazon's forest is so large that every day the scale of this unique biodiversity decreases and many species of living organisms cease to exist.

Human civilization in this way destroys one of the greatest achievements in the development of life, the evolution of ecosystems on Earth.

This is a very serious problem to solve in the 21st century.

Therefore, I am addressing you with an important question: What should you do to limit the devastation of Amazon rainforests?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

Should chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable forestry, and technologies that relate to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Many studies show that the most effective organic forestry consists in cultivating forest stands in a formula referring to natural, complex, biologically multispecies ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity.

The ecological forestry formula based on the cultivation of many different species of trees and shrubs adjacent to each other, referring to the formation of a natural ecosystem, allows to eliminate chemical measures to protect forest spruce and shrubs and reduce biological fertilization.

Only the application of biologically neutral machines and technical devices to crops to correct the functioning of organic forest crops would allow the improvement of this formula and striving to achieve sustainable forestry.

Only the question of the legitimacy of using or possibly resigning from the creation of new, more resistant to various diseases and pests, new varieties of cultivated trees and shrubs through the use of genetics engineering would remain to be considered.

It is not about creation of new species of plants or animals through genetic manipulation techniques, but about breeding newer varieties of forest trees and shrubs that are more resistant to diseases and pests as a perfecting formula of cultivation referring to the natural ecosystem.

Cultivation of forest stands referring to the formula of the natural biological ecosystem should be improved by creating and introducing to these complex crops these new varieties of trees and shrubs in order to restore biological balance, which was previously significantly reduced through the widespread use of forest and forestry monoculture carried out under classic forestry.

In this way, it is possible to recreate sustainable forestry in the future in areas where classical monocultural forest crops were previously grown or in reclaimed areas.

In view of the above, I would like to ask you: should sustainable chemistry and monoculture be reduced in sustainable forestry, and forestry techniques referring to natural ecosystems should be developed?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

One of my biggest concerns in the fall in insect numbers. The fall in insect numbers has a massive effect on the planet since insects supply a lot of larger animals with their nutrients. They are also pollinating and assist the plant species of the planer. Therefore for me one of the biggest challenges of now, is to try and prevent the current decline and if possible reverse it. There are many things that could be affecting it or contributing to this decline and these need to be investigated for instance pesticide in argriculture.

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

Will we be able to stop adverse climate changes, global warming, and the greenhouse effect on Earth?

Will we be able to stop or at least significantly slow down adverse climate changes, global warming, the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth and the declining resources of natural biological environments, ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity?

This is probably the most important problem to explore and solve in the 21st century.

Unfortunately, many people, including politicians and entrepreneurs managing large industrial corporations ignore the seriousness of this problem. It is necessary to develop research in this area, in the matter of examining the determinants of climate change, global warming, rising average temperature on the Earth, progressing greenhouse effect on Earth.

These problems must be publicized in the mass media. While it is not too late, while this unfavorable process can be partially reversed. Or maybe we can not reverse this process anymore? Maybe it's too late? What then, will we be able to protect, at least partially, the biosphere, natural ecosystems due to these adverse climate changes, anomalies and climatic cataclysms, from drought in many areas currently agricultural or possessing a rich biosphere?

Research on these topics needs to be developed, publicized, and published. Perhaps, finally, politicians and owners of industrial corporations will change their approach to more pro-ecological.

This is probably the most important question for the 21st century: Will we be able to stop or at least significantly slow down adverse climate changes, global warming, the progressing greenhouse effect on Earth and the declining resources of natural biological environments, ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity?

Please reply. I invite you to the discussion

If it is no longer possible to reverse the global warming process, will we at least slow down the adverse climate change, the warming of the Earth's temperature, the progressive greenhouse effect on Earth?

What actions should be taken now to make this possible in the 21st century?

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

In many countries, in individual regions and urban agglomerations, tree planting projects are currently underway as part of afforestation programs for civilization-modified areas. In some countries afforestation of civilizational modified areas is considered one of the most important instruments to neutralize the negative effects of greenhouse gas emissions. The main premise of this thesis is the fact that certain species of trees and shrubs absorb significant amounts of CO2 and improve microclimate and water management in surface layers of soil. However, according to the results of scientific research in a situation of high greenhouse gas emissions, afforestation will not solve the problem of global warming.

If in a given country, in a given agglomeration the majority of households, motor vehicles and enterprises from the energy sector relies on burning of minerals, the emission of greenhouse gases is so high that afforestation may reduce this emission to a very small extent. In this situation, apart from afforestation, other projects should be developed that will enable the implementation of the principles of sustainable, pro-ecological development based on the concept of a new, green economy. These other pro-ecological undertakings include, first of all, the development of renewable energy sources, increasing the efficiency of waste segregation, recovering secondary materials, development of electromobility in the automotive industry, development of programs for implementation, implementation and financing of eco-innovations, such as the construction of small household ecological power plants based eg on installing house roofs photovoltaic panels replacing stoves, in which often poor quality minerals are burned, etc. Therefore, afforestation does not solve the serious problem of global warming but should be developed as one of many instruments to reduce the negative greenhouse gas emission effects.

In addition, it is particularly important to protect existing forest resources, including natural forest ecosystems characterized by high biodiversity, and therefore a high biological value, such as rainforest, tropic rainforest of the Amazon. However, this is only an example of the largest, existing natural forest ecosystem on Earth. All other such ecosystems should be under strict protection and should be excluded from the predatory, devastating forest exploitation economy, i.e. harvesting timber from these natural forest ecosystems, because in the context of the problem of global warming they are one of the most important, most valuable resources of the planet Earth .

In view of the above, the current question is: Can the afforestation of civilization-modified areas significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Due to the current civilization progress in recent decades, acceleration of the development of industry, automotive, urban agglomerations, intensification of agricultural production, etc. and related greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, ozone layer depletion in the atmosphere, increase of environmental pollution, growing problem of smog in urban agglomerations, the increase in pollution of the seas and oceans to which unsorted waste is thrown away is cut out as part of the predatory economy of tropical forests in the Amazon and other largest natural forest ecosystems.

In addition, the secondary effect of global warming of the Earth's climate is the increasing, more frequent weather anomalies, including drought, leading to steppe and desertification of areas that were previously natural forest ecosystems or areas exploited by agriculture.

As a result of the above-mentioned processes, every year many species of flora and fauna disappear forever.

As a result, natural biodiversity diminishes, which for millions of years evolved evolutionally on Earth.

In this way the natural resources of the planet Earth are irretrievably in decline.

In view of the above, the issue of environmental protection and biodiversity is one of the most important challenges of humanity in the 21st century.

Classical economics must change towards a green economy based on the strategy of sustainable pro-ecological development.

Therefore, I am asking you for the following query:

How can environmental protection and biodiversity be improved by using current ecological technologies?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

Should the 21st century be a century of green economy, sustainable pro-ecological development and protection of the environment and biodiversity?

Do you agree with my thesis that the 21st century should be a century of pro-ecological reforms, the age of green economy, sustainable pro-ecological development and protection of the environment and biodiversity?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

Best wishes

Another proposal for a research topic in this field:

What eco-innovation can be used in the future to protect the environment and biodiversity?

Innovations in energy technologies are being developed, technologies for renewable energy sources, electromobility, waste segregation, purification of contaminated water in rivers, ecological material innovations, eg replacement of plastic packaging for biodegradable materials, etc. are developed and improved.

All this constitutes an element of systemic sustainable pro-ecological economic development based on the concept of green economy.

Thanks to the dissemination of systemic sustainable ecological development in the future, it will be possible to slow down the unfavorable warming of the Earth's climate and increase the scale of environmental protection and biodiversity.

Dissemination of systemic sustainable ecological development in the near future can save the planet Earth, many species of plants, animals and people from destruction, which may occur at the end of the 21st century, if the above-mentioned pro-ecological reforms are not introduced universally, globally, ie in all countries.

Do you agree with my opinion?

In connection with the above, I would like to ask you:

According to you, which eco-innovations are the most important for future protection of the environment and biodiversity?

Which ecological innovations do you think should be developed universally and to the greatest extent possible?

Please reply

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

Will the development of green economy stop the devastation of the natural environment?

Will man manage to develop a globally sustainable proecological economic development based on the concept of green economy before it is too late, before the total devastation of natural environments and ecosystems will occur?

In the 21st century, will man change the development of civilization towards sustainable ecological development in order to stop the degradation of natural ecosystems?

Should environmental protection obtain a key priority to protect many species of plants and animals from extinction in order to protect and maintain biodiversity?

In my opinion, the development of civilization should move towards sustainable ecological development!

The protection of the natural environment and biodiversity should be achieved by the key 21st century privatizens!

It's not too late yet!

Do you agree with my opinion?

Please reply

Best wishes

In addition, I propose the following research question in this area:

Is protection of the natural environment and biodiversity one of the greatest civilization challenges of the 21st century?

Do you agree with my opinion that protection of the natural environment, biodiversity is one of the greatest civilization challenges of the 21st century?

Please reply

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What is the role of biodiversity in the natural environment?

Biodiversity is a very important issue in the context of the analysis of ecology, sustainable development and the protection of the natural environment, including, above all, the natural sites of biologically deposited ecosystems, ie those characterized by high biodiversity.

Maintaining biodiversity of natural ecosystems is one of the most important problems and tasks for people in the 21st century.

I invite you to discuss this important topic

Biodiversity consists in the cooperation of a few species of plants, animals, fungi, bacteria and possibly other microorganisms. For example, in natural tropical rainforests there is a lot of biodiversity, because in this forest there are many species of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria next to each other.

Biodiversity is the largest unique, unique, difficult to reproduce, unique value of natural, complex biological ecosystems. An example is the tropical forest in the Amazon.

What needs to be done to reduce the devastation of the Amazon rainforests, which are characterized by high biodiversity and are therefore a unique, biological richness of the natural ecosystem on Earth?

The Amazon rainforest is the largest complex of the natural forest ecosystem producing 60% oxygen on Earth, these are the lungs of the planet Earth.

In addition, it is a natural complex of forest ecosystem with rich biodiversity.

In these Amazonian ecosystems there are still many, millions of species of flora and fauna that have not yet been fully discovered or described.

The scale of felling and thinning stands in the Amazon's forest is so large that every day the scale of this unique biodiversity decreases and many species of living organisms cease to exist.

Human civilization in this way destroys one of the greatest achievements in the development of life, the evolution of ecosystems on Earth.

This is a very serious problem to solve in the 21st century.

Therefore, I am addressing you with an important question: What needs to be done to reduce the devastation of the Amazon rainforests, which are characterized by high biodiversity and are therefore a unique, biological richness of the natural ecosystem on Earth?

Please, answer, comments.

I invite you to the discussion.

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Will the man manage to switch the classic energy to renewable energy sources to slow down the global warming process?

Key questions for humanity in the 21st century:

- Will the man manage to switch the classic energy to renewable energy sources to slow down the global warming process and prevent global climate catastrophe and the destruction of most life forms at the end of the 21st century, if so little will be done on the issue of the implementation of the necessary proecological reforms?

- In the 21st century, will man be able to convert most of the classic energy into renewable energy sources to achieve a fully sustainable ecological economy based on the concept of green economy?

- In the 21st century, will man be able to switch most of the classic energy based on the burning of minerals by turning this source of environmental pollution and a source of global warming to renewable energy sources to achieve a fully sustainable ecological economy based on the concept of green economy?

- In the 21st century, will a man in the development of civilization manage to achieve a fully sustainable ecological economy based on the concept of green economy before the global climate catastrophe?

The ever-faster greenhouse effect on Earth has already been recognized by many research centers as fact. If the global warming process is not stopped by introducing environmentally-friendly economic policy reforms, the development of ecological and innovative technologies, primarily in the field of renewable energy, electromobility, waste segregation, recycling, etc. Earth at the end of the 21st century is threatened by global climate disaster related to global warming and rising frequency and scale of emerging weather anomalies and climatic cataclysms.

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:In the 21st century, will a man in the development of civilization manage to achieve a fully sustainable ecological economy based on the concept of green economy before the global climate catastrophe?

Please replyI invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

Ecosystems and biodiversity are not just victims of climate change, but can also play a critical role in mitigation and adaptation. While the primary focus of climate change strategies is likely to remain on cleaner energy technologies and reduced emissions of GHGs, there is increasing recognition that natural habitats, and in particular protected areas, can make a significant contribution to mitigation by storing and sequestering carbon in vegetation and soils, and to adaptation by helping societies to respond, and adapt, to the changes that are occurring.

Reference

Dudley, N . et al. ( eds). (2010). Natural Solutions: Protected Areas Helping People to Cope with Climate Change. IUCN-WCPA, TNC, UNDP, WCS, World Bank and WWF, Gland, Switzerland.

Read interesting article

Evolution in biodiversity policy – current gaps and future needs, Evol Appl. 2012 Feb; 5(2): 202–218.

By contemplating more in the living environment in different climates and reviving the respect for nature and utilizing the existing systems in the organs of living organisms to construct passive systems .

Following

Following

Great paper about it: Smirnova O.V., Toropova N.A. Potential ecosystem cover – a new approach to conservation biology. Russian Journal of Ecosystem Ecology. – 2016. – Vol. 1 (1). DOI: 10.21685/2500-0578-2016-1-1.

The problems: unification of ideas, actions and work in specific groups. The theses: better elaboration and unification of the diverse areas of biodiversity interest

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

How would you rate the environmental protection activities undertaken in your country?

How would you rate the environmental protection activities undertaken in your country? Are these actions sufficient?

Are activities undertaken in the field of environmental protection insufficient? If they are insufficient, what do you think should be done in terms of increasing environmental protection efforts?

The problem of environmental protection currently does not apply only to the reductions emitted by industry, automotive industry and developing urban agglomerations of environmental pollution. The problem of environmental protection is increasingly connected with greenhouse gas emissions and gradual increase of temperature at the Earth's surface and related climate changes, increasing scale and frequency of weather anomalies and increasingly occurring climatic cataclysms.

It is necessary to develop renewable energy sources and ecological innovations in energy and other areas of green economy development. It is necessary to increase the dimension in sustainable economies as soon as possible in order to slow down the global warming process and reduce the scale of environmental pollution and to increase the scale of projects undertaken to rehabilitate a degraded environment.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How would you rate the environmental protection activities undertaken in your country?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Best wishes

Accordingly, I propose the following research question in this area:

How should you improve the economical sustainable environmentally friendly clean water economy?

By 2040, a deficit of clear water will appear in most countries in the world.On the one hand, the use of water in the production industry of various technical and automotive goods is growing, but also in some areas of food production.For example, 1650 liters of water absorbs, for example, the production of 1 hamburger, because the production of meat absorbs very large amounts of water.In addition, a progressive global warming process and more and more frequent droughts appearing in various places around the earth, mainly in the subtropics and in some places of the temperate climate.

In connection with the above, the question becomes more and more relevant:

How should you improve the economical sustainable environmentally friendly clean water economy?

How to improve the processes of purification of used, contaminated water?

How to obtain water develop technologies for desalination of sea water or condensation of water in areas subject to periodic drought?

How to improve the extraction of pure Oligocene water contained in the Earth's crust in desert areas?

Please reply

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

How can you speed up the processes of changing the classic economy in green economy?

How can you speed up the processes of changing the classical economy in green economy shaped according to the principles of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

From time to time, conferences and climates summit are held in various countries around the world. In principle, everyone agrees on the importance of implementing the necessary pro-ecological reforms in economic processes. In addition to representatives of mining companies of energy resources for the traditional energy of burning mineral and traditional power plants, everyone agrees that in order to slow down the global warming processes that are unfavorable for the natural environment, it is necessary to implement pro-ecological reforms as soon as possible. above all, to develop renewable energy sources on a larger scale. In addition, pro-ecological innovations on an industrial scale should be implemented as soon as possible.

Recently, this type of climatic summit took place in Katowice in Poland. It was the UN climate summit, the so-called COP (Conference of the Parties) on climate policy on Earth. UN climate summits, i.e. COP (Conference of the Parties) are global conferences during which climate policy is negotiated. Poland twice hosted them - in 2008 in Poznań and in 2013 in Warsaw. In December 2018, the climate summit is held for the first time now in Katowice in Poland. During this summit, conferences were held, discussions on the need to develop a sustainable development policy and the need for ecological development, renewable energy sources to generate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the future, and ultimately to limit the average annual temperature on the Earth's surface.

From the discussions it follows that it is necessary to develop ecological innovations, new pro-ecological energy sources, and to develop the electromobility of transport means. It is necessary to develop and implement on a large scale renewable energy sources. In addition, it is important to increase the scale of afforestation, as forests and the flora contained in them absorb a large proportion of greenhouse gas emissions.

As part of the UN climate summit of December 2018, the following were held: the 24th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP24), 14th Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 14) and the Conference of the Paris Agreement signatories (CMA 1). About 20,000 people from 190 countries took part in the event, including politicians, representatives of non-governmental organizations, and scientific and business spheres.

The lecture delivered during the climatic summit shows that in recent years the warming of the Earth's climate has accelerated significantly and therefore, in the black scenario of future climate changes, the temperature on the Earth's surface can rise by 4 ° C to the end of the 21st century. If this happened, then the scale of climate-related cataclysms that are dangerous to human beings will increase many times, including droughts, floods, fires and weather anomalies in many places around the world. The problem is very serious globally and therefore a lot depends on whether international cooperation will develop in order to limit these problems and their negative effects.

In view of the above, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth from destruction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environmental reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

Unfortunately, perhaps the only major positive effect of these conferences and climate summits is the promotion of the need to apply these pro-ecological reforms in the media. However, the scale of real actions in this direction, the scale of expenditure growth supported by subsidies from state budgets for the development of energy based on renewable energy sources, the development of electromobility, improvement of sorting and recycling processes is still small in relation to the needs.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

How can you speed up the processes of changing the classical economy in green economy shaped according to the principles of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Will ecological innovations help in speeding up the process of a globally changing civilization development strategy towards sustainable ecological and social development?

Yes, it is necessary to change the development strategy based on intensifying the exploitation of the Earth's resources on the sustainable development strategy. It is necessary to develop new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources to slow down the progressing greenhouse effect of the Earth in order to reduce the risk of dramatic natural cataclysms. It is necessary to develop ecological innovations, while it may not be too late. It is necessary to save the Earth through destruction for future generations.

The 21st century is the last moment to introduce global sustainable development based on the development of renewable energy and ecological innovations. Sustainable development should be analyzed and measured in correlation with the analysis of economic growth and the share of individual sectors in the country's economic development, including the transformation of traditional energy sources into renewable energy, environment reclamation and recovery of recyclable materials, and ecological innovations.

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Best wishes

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What is the significance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

What instruments of state intervention are applied in your country as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy?

In some developing countries, pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policies and pro-social housing policies are currently underway, which are a significant determinant of high economic growth and provide citizens with material and economic well-being. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used as part of pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy and pro-social housing policy.

The applied state intervention instruments also contribute to the activation of innovation and entrepreneurship, reduction of unemployment, investment growth, income and consumption. In individual countries, analogical instruments of state intervention are usually used, including selected instruments of fiscal, budgetary and monetary policy, however, in a different structure of the use of individual instruments and a different share of their financing from the public finances of the state.

In my opinion, the development of innovative technologies and their implementation into the production processes of both consumer and investment products, e.g. construction prefabricates and ecological materials, energy innovations is a growing factor of pro-development, anti-crisis, countercyclical, Keynesian socio-economic policy, including pro-social development. housing policy?

In a situation where pro-ecologic innovations are also developed, including the new ones, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy acquires additional attributes of modernity taking into account the protection of natural resources of the environment.

In this situation, the classic pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian social and economic policy is transformed into an ecological socio-economic policy implemented into the economy as part of the promotion of sustainable pro-ecological socio-economic development taking into account the new green economy principles.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

What is the importance of innovative technologies in shaping pro-development, anti-crisis, counter-cyclical, Keynesian, pro-ecological socio-economic policy?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Thank you very much for your response and participation in the discussion

Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG

The issues of specific programs to improve the economic, financial, material and housing situation of households as key instruments of pro-development state intervention and significant components of the socio-economic policy of the state I described in the publications:

Article FAMILY 500 PLUS PROGRAMS AND FLAT PLUS WITH KEY INSTRUMENTS ...

Article Ability to Generate Financial Savings by Households in Poland

Article ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HOUSEHOLDS IN POLAND – A...

I invite you to discussion and cooperation.

Best wishes

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

To what extent does the development of eco-innovation and renewable energy improve the protection of the environment, natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity?

In my opinion, the development of innovative ecological technologies and eco-innovations as well as renewable energy sources and their implementation into economic processes is a growing important factor of sustainable green economic development based on the green economy concept.

In a situation where pro-ecological innovations are developed, including energy-related innovations, including new technologies of renewable energy sources, then pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian socio-economic policy obtains additional attributes of modernity taking into account the protection of natural resources of the environment, protection of natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity.

In this situation, the classic pro-development anti-crisis, Keynesian social and economic policy is transformed into an ecological socio-economic policy implemented into the economy as part of the promotion of sustainable proecological socio-economic development taking into account the new green economy principles, including care for the protection of natural environmental resources, protection natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

To what extent does the development of eco-innovation and renewable energy improve the protection of the environment, natural biological ecosystems and biodiversity?

Please reply

I invite you to discussion and scientific cooperation

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Lifestyle, desire of individuals , greedy of capitalisim, side effects of technology, man made systems cannot mimicry natural systems. These factors will affect natural system and biodiversity which form the driver for the stability of the natural system.

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?

Protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development?

In the context of growing and increasing environmental pollution and declining areas of natural ecosystems, the importance and need to improve environmental protection systems, natural ecosystems and biodiversity is increasing. Biodiversity is one of the most important issues of natural ecosystems and life on Earth. Maintaining high biodiversity on Earth should be a challenge and one of the main goals of human functioning on the Earth in the 21st century and in subsequent centuries.

In connection with the above, protection of the environment, natural ecosystems and biodiversity should be an integral part of the concept of sustainable ecological development. In some countries, the concept of sustainable pro-ecological economic development is implemented successively, primarily in the field of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation techniques and recycling development. However, in many countries these issues are still insufficiently developed.

Still too small financial resources are allocated in many countries for the development of renewable energy sources, improvement of waste segregation and recycling techniques. In addition to the private sector, besides enterprises implementing ecological innovations, it is necessary to increase expenditures and develop strategic pro-ecological reform projects, including restructuring of the mining industry of minerals supplying classic energy sources and development of energy based on renewable energy sources. This development should be supported and coordinated by environmentally friendly state intervention, and due to the high investment costs of construction of power plants producing electricity from renewable energy sources should be co-financed from the state public finance funds.

In this way, it will be possible to slow down the ongoing global warming process in the 21st century and thus slow down the process of devastating the natural environment, draining green areas characterized by high biodiversity. Biodiversity is a very important issue in the context of the analysis of ecology, sustainable development and the protection of the natural environment, including, in particular, the natural positions of biologically complex ecosystems, i.e. those that are characterized by high biodiversity. Maintaining biodiversity of natural ecosystems is one of the most important problems and tasks for people in the 21st century.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is still valid:

How to increase the effectiveness of environmental protection programs, natural ecosystems and biodiversity?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

Should the state co-finance the development of renewable energy sources or only the private sector?

A significant part of the pro-ecological reforms as part of the transformation of the energy sector and the development of renewable energy sources is carried out by private companies.

However, these are usually undertakings not resulting from market processes only from changing legal norms established by the state administration.

In addition, the construction of large nuclear power plants, water plants and the type of large wind and solar farms absorbs huge financial resources with predicted relatively low profitability.

Therefore, private enterprises are not interested in investing in the development of large power plants that produce electricity under renewable energy sources if the state does not provide financial support under financial guarantees and a share in investment costs.

The development of electromobility in the automotive industry in some countries is also supported by the state to a large extent.

In some countries, the state from the budget funds of the central public finance system refinances a significant part of the costs of purchasing an electric car and finances the development of the necessary infrastructure of electric vehicle charging points deployed on the streets and arteries.

Therefore, the development of renewable energy sources, ie the key element of the pro-ecological transformation of the energy sector, should be coordinated organisationally and financially supported by the state.

In the context of increasing emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere and the ever-faster global warming process, the pro-ecological transformation of the energy sector should be carried out as soon as possible.

It is not possible to implement proecological reforms in the energy sector and implement ecological innovations in other sectors of industry as well as wait for the resources of energy (hard coal, lignite, oil, natural gas) to run out.

This process can not be left solely to the market mechanism within the framework of classical or neoclassical economics.

In order for an environmentally-friendly transformation of the energy sector to be effected efficiently and as soon as possible, a significant share of financial support from the state is indispensable.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

Should the state co-finance the development of renewable energy sources or only the private sector?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?

Biodiversity is diverse in virtually unlimited degree, which results from the essence of processes of evolution of species, filet lines and entire ecosystems. It is thanks to the millions of years of evolutionary processes on Earth that there are so many different natural and highly diverse ecosystems in which different species of flora, fauna, fungi and microorganisms adapt to life in different and very diverse geographical and climatic environments.

The largest biodiversity of ecosystems and species functions in natural environmental environments in which ecosystems have evolved without human impact through millions of years of climatic and geographical conditions enabling the development of various life forms. These types of high biodiversity sites can be found in unpolluted rainforest ecosystems in tropical forests, in temperate climates and in coral reefs.

Unfortunately, human civilization activity contributes to the successive and accelerating process of biodiversity reduction by dying out species of living organisms. The areas of natural natural ecosystems are decreasing, including those in which the greatest biodiversity is diagnosed, such as the rainforests of the Amazon. The protection of naturalistic ecosystems and thus the protection of the planet's biodiversity is the most important challenge for mankind in the 21st century.

Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?

In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:

What do you think is the importance of biodiversity in natural ecosystems?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

How should nature conservation and biodiversity be developed?

In your opinion, how should nature conservation, biological ecosystems, individual species of flora and fauna and biodiversity be developed?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

The development and the biodiversity be to conservate the natural resources whitout to scarrs rational use the natural resources and controled human actions

I suggest the following questions and research problems in the above topic:

In what directions are researching biological biodiversity currently going?

Do biological biodiversity research currently affect, among others, the following problems:

- Analysis of changes, usually poorer biodiversity of natural biological ecosystems under the influence of human activity,

- Does the depletion of biodiversity of natural ecosystems under the influence of human activity usually lead to disturbance of the biological balance shaped by millions of years?

- Does the decline in the number of species of flora and fauna, the loss of biodiversity of natural ecosystems reduce the resistance of ecosystems to faster and faster changes in the Earth's climate?

- Will the ongoing changes in the Earth's climate, the ongoing global warming process change natural biological ecosystems, create new environments that can be studied in the context of accelerated processes of the evolution of biological ecosystems?

- Can changes in the biodiversity of natural ecosystems caused by the impact of human activity be considered as a continuation of the evolutionary process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

How to increase the effectiveness of the institutional policy of nature protection and biodiversity?

How should the systems of nature protection and biodiversity of natural ecosystems be dispersed in order to increase the effectiveness of these systems and reduce the scale of degradation of the natural environment?

What do you think should be improved in nature conservation systems and biodiversity of natural ecosystems in addition to just increasing financial outlays on nature conservation policies conducted by government agencies and ministries of the environment?

A significant part of financial expenditures of nature conservation and biodiversity policy is devoted to the promotion of nature protection and natural environment protection issues. However, the effectiveness of this type of promotional campaigns is low, because without applying legal restrictions, enterprises do not change their technologies to be more ecological if they do not see in this business realized in a short time. Even the occasional UN climate summits in which government representatives from the majority of countries take part do not cause significant real changes in the policy of nature protection and biodiversity? Usually, the largest industrial economies in the world do not sign the obligations of rapid reduction of greenhouse gases and the issue of increasing spending on environmental innovation in the energy sector. Why, despite the growing scale of public awareness, there is no significant improvement in the implementation of nature conservation and biodiversity policy, there are no real measures that would result in a significant reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and the slowing of the global warming process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

What are the examples of eco-innovations that reduce environmental pollution and the global warming process?

What are the examples of eco-innovations that can significantly reduce the scale of environmental pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow down the faster global warming process?

Currently, the problem of growing garbage with unsorted waste is ignored in many countries, but because in the future the negative aspects of the problem of environmental pollution, including plastic, will grow, so in the future other countries will also try to solve this problem.

The problem of environmental pollution with plastic waste is one of the key global problems. This problem should be solved in all countries, and above all those that "generate" the most. The European Union has already undertaken specific measures in this direction, eg by introducing legal regulations under which plastic will be withdrawn from packaging by 2021 and replaced with biodegradable materials such as vegetable origin. However, these regulations concern only European Union countries.

Similarly with other aspects of environmental pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Also, some large global economies are currently ignoring growing problems. But such an approach must be quickly changed, because there is little time to implement pro-ecological reforms, primarily in terms of reducing environmental pollution and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

As regards the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, it is necessary to reform the energy sector in such a way as to switch from the production of electricity based on the classic energy based on the combustion of minerals to technologies based on the development of renewable energy sources. In addition, it is also important to develop electromobility in the automotive industry and other types of transport.

The global warming process is progressing faster, the scale of the negative effects of climatic disasters and weather anomalies, which are a consequence of the ever-faster global warming process, is increasing. There is little time left, according to climatologists only max. over a dozen years to implement the necessary ecological reforms and innovations, including in the area of ??energy development based on renewable energy sources, to stop or even significantly slow down the ever-faster global warming process.

In addition, one of the main types of eco-innovations includes innovative technologies for building zero-energy houses and residential buildings. The special design and materials used ensure low energy consumption and closure of the energy cycle in a cycle in which household power plants generating heat and electricity based on renewable energy sources are an integral part, primarily through the use of photovoltaic panels and wind farms.

As part of the implementation of the necessary pro-ecological reforms, it is also necessary to develop eco-innovations that will improve the automation of waste segregation and recycling processes. In addition, it is also important to create innovative technologies for the creation of new biodegradable materials that will replace plastic in packaging.

A good solution is the use of packaging made of biodegradable materials of origin, eg vegetable, on the basis of raw materials in the form of crops. These types of packaging could be consumed after their use, such as plates and cutlery made of rice or other cereals, or could be processed into compost for animal feed or for fertilizing arable land, or for incineration in a specially built incineration plant.

In connection with the above, the increasingly common application of ecological innovations, which are necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to limit, slow down the faster global warming process, will also contribute to increasing the scale of sustainable green economic development realized according to the green economy concept.

These processes of implementation of ecological innovations and implementation of pro-ecological reforms should be conducted in all countries, and to the largest extent in developed and developing countries, industrialized countries, including the largest economies in the world, which are the largest emitters of greenhouse gases and producers of garbage and non-degradable waste , toxic or hardly degradable.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

What are the examples of eco-innovations that can significantly reduce the scale of environmental pollution and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and slow down the faster global warming process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

Are there banks and / or companies that take into account forecasted climate changes in their business decisions?

Some banks conducting an analysis of the creditworthiness of an enterprise applying for a long-term investment or mortgage loan take into account the issues of climate change, if these changes may affect the business profitability of a specific lending business venture. For example, in the case of a hotel application for a long-term investment loan operating on the sea, the level of which can rise and flood the hotel area.

Another example is a hotel located in the mountains, where winter sports tourists come. Climate change predictions may indicate that 10 years of snow will no longer be the place where this hotel in the mountains provides its services. Therefore, the bank may not grant credit due to the forecasted secondary effects of progressive climate changes and, above all, the rising average temperature.

On the other hand, companies are developing which produce components for new power plants producing electricity as part of renewable energy sources, produce electric car equipment components, e.g. electric motors, batteries, etc. More and more innovative startups are being produced as part of cooperation with large enterprises and renewable energy plants Wind turbine type subassemblies, charging devices for electric cars, etc. Other companies manufacture packaging from recycled materials, recycled or from biodegradable materials.

Other companies are developing innovative solutions for automatic sorting of rubbish. If eco-friendly products become popular and the state creates good institutional, legal and financial conditions for the development of such projects, then the process of implementing sustainable green economy based on the green economy concept will be implemented more quickly and business probes will become more and more profitable. Financial institutions, including banks, will gradually take into consideration eco-friendly processes and business activities of clients in concluded financial transactions.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

Are there banks and / or companies that take into account forecasted climate changes in their business decisions?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, the following question is also current:

What should be the use of pro-ecological reforms derived from the conclusions of UN reports on the global warming process?

What should be the actions in the field of national economic policy and pro-environmental reforms in relation to the UN reports published on the adverse effects of the ever-faster global warming process?

What should be applied in the field of national economic policy and pro-ecological reforms regarding UN reports on adverse effects of increasing climate change, temperature increase at the Earth's surface, increase in greenhouse gas emissions, global warming process progressing faster, increasing environmental pollution , declining areas of natural habitats, depletion of natural biological ecosystems, extinction of many species of flora and fauna, falling biological diversity on Earth, etc.?

Currently (mid-May 2019) a UN report appeared, which shows that the species extinction process accelerates and is no longer invertible, it is not possible to stop this process. However, if humanity quickly implements pro-ecological reforms, implementation of sustainable environmentally friendly development consistent with the green economy concept, it is possible to significantly slow down the process of greenhouse gas emissions, environmental pollution and unfavorable processes in nature.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

What should be the actions in the field of national economic policy and pro-environmental reforms in relation to the UN reports published on the adverse effects of the ever-faster global warming process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

Smart city + Green engineering = Green Smart city?

Will modern urban agglomerations built in the future be planned and will be built according to the concept of smart city and green engineering?

Is the technological revolution Industry 4.0 is and will be the main determinant of changes in smart home technology, smart home security and the possibility of combining smart home technologies with the implementation of the principles of sustainable pro-ecological economic development into the development processes of the construction sector, including construction of housing estates and modern urban agglomerations ? Will modern urban agglomerations built in the future be planned and will be built according to the concept of smart city and green engineering?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

Following

Therefore, in the context of the above considerations, the following important question appears:

How should the concept of sustainable pro-ecological development according to green economy develop in the 21st century?

In what way should it develop and disseminate the concept of sustainable ecological development in accordance with the green economy formula in the 21st century?

In my opinion, additional taxation of enterprises in order to obtain funds in this way for the development of renewable energy, development of eco-innovations and reduction of environmental pollution is not the best solution. A better solution is to generate high economic growth based on the successively introduced model of sustainable green economic development implemented according to the green economy concept.

It is necessary to conduct reliable, honest, ethical business and social responsibility of business socio-economic policy while educating the public on the need to implement the necessary pro-ecological reforms in the energy sector as soon as possible by developing renewable energy sources, developing electromobility, efficient waste sorting technologies, improvement recycling, zero-energy construction, elimination of plastic from packaging and conversion to biodegradable plastics, etc.

Then, using such a reliable social and economic policy, it would be possible to extend the periods of host growth in business cycles to generate budgetary surpluses. In the situation of budgetary surpluses in the state budget, a significant part of them should be allocated for state financing of investments in large infrastructural pro-ecological projects, such as nuclear power plants, wind farms, solar panels based on photovoltaic panels and other based on renewable energy sources.

After many years of running this type of pro-ecological socio-economic policy, certain technologies that allowed for the development of ecological innovations and their implementation on an industrial scale will gradually become, and after their dissemination, production costs of certain devices such as household mini-power plants producing renewable energy on the basis of renewable energy. energy sources will be available for most families living, for example, single-family houses or multi-family housing estates. On the other hand, by popularizing these pro-ecological technologies, companies that produce specific ecological products will generate revenues and profits.

In view of the above, in this way the new green economy will become profitable and will be a kind of a new epoch of the neoclassical economics model enriched with pro-ecological goals and functions. In this way, initially through a centrally planned system, through state intervention in a mainly market economy, through a national pro-ecological socio-economic policy, a new model of the economic system will be built after years, which will function objectively within the framework of sustainable green economic development.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

In what way should it develop and disseminate the concept of sustainable ecological development in accordance with the green economy formula in the 21st century?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the above considerations, I also propose the following research problem:

What changes in natural ecosystems are caused by the ongoing global warming process?

Global warming affects many processes in biological ecosystems. Different species of flora and fauna change their habitats and geographical areas according to climate change and specific geographical environments. Areas of occurrence of specific species, for example insects in terrestrial areas and fish and arthropods in the seas and oceans, change. Bird habitats change, so migrations of some bird species may also be subject to modification. In the situation when forest areas dry out and turn into steppes and deserts, changes in natural habitats and areas of occurrence of species change and concern simultaneously many species of flora and fauna.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

What changes in natural ecosystems are caused by the ongoing global warming process?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In addition, I note the interesting discussion inspired me to the following considerations:

How should the environmental policy change in order to stop the predatory exploitation of the Amazon rainforests?

What must change in economic policy to stop the predatory exploitation of the Amazon rainforests, i.e. the largest complex of natural forest ecosystems of forest environments, in addition characterized by the greatest biogeographical biodiversity of flora and fauna?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In the context of the progressive warming of the Earth's climate, the following question is of particular importance:

Will ecology become one of the key aspects of globalization in the 21st century?

Due to the progressing global warming process, the issue of necessary ecological reforms should be one of the most important issues shaping the processes of globalization in the 21st century.

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

What is the impact of the global warming process on freshwater resources and the issue of biodiversity on Earth?

Climate change, i.e. the ongoing global warmin process, causes the drainage of many areas of the tropical and subtropical zones, and therefore freshwater resources are falling. This will probably be one of the most serious effects and problems of the global warming process that is progressing faster and faster. The issue of falling freshwater resources is one of the most serious problems and challenges for humanity in the 21st century. It is also a problem for biological ecosystems that undergo drying and, therefore, biodiversity, including biodiversity of flora and fauna on Earth, is also diminishing.

Do you agree with me on the above matter?

In the context of the above issues, I am asking you the following question:

What is the impact of the global warming process on freshwater resources and the issue of biodiversity on Earth?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

In view of the above, it is also important to include in the above discussion also the following issue:

Is the conservation of biodiversity of entire biological ecosystems the key issue of nature conservation?

In the context of climate change predicted for the 21st century, which is a derivative of the ever-faster global warming process, is the conservation of biodiversity of entire biological ecosystems the key issue of nature protection?

Please reply

I invite you to the discussion

Thank you very much

Best wishes

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318760929_My_Village_Biodiversity_Documentation_of_Western_Ghats_Biodiversity_through_Network_of_Students_and_Teachers

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331076568_Global_Warming_Mitigation_Through_Carbon_Sequestrations_in_the_Central_Western_Ghats/stats

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323180165_Salient_Ecological_Sensitive_Regions_of_Central_Western_Ghats_India

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332331409_Sustainable_Management_of_Bannerghatta_National_Park_India_with_the_Insights_in_Land_Cover_Dynamics

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301609558_Geospatial_analysis_of_forest_fragmentation_in_Uttara_Kannada_District_India

I propose the following proposal for a research topic in this area:

What part of Amazon ecosystems species flora and fauna is not yet known or not studied and not described?

Is it only lack of knowledge, lack of awareness of societies about how much humanity loses, how much it loses in the potential of science and technology development in the situation of cutting natural highly biodiverse ecosystems that will not be reborn themselves, they will not recreate themselves without the use of huge expenditures, usually much larger than profits from the wood obtained from the forest?

It is estimated that many species of flora and fauna occurring in tropical rainforests of the Amazon, in this unique, natural forest, characterized by high biodiversity, have not yet been completely discovered. In addition, there are many species of flora and fauna found in tropical rainforests of the Amazon, which have been found, discovered but have not yet been thoroughly researched and described, have not been named.

Much of the undiscovered species of flora and fauna found in tropical rainforests of the Amazon can never be discovered, because the Amazon rainforest is cut so quickly and its area is rapidly decreasing. Unfortunately, due to the type of soil and the specific microclimate created by the tropical forest, it is not possible to recreate a fully cut forest of the tropical forest without the use of huge expenditure. Because the cut forest is often not reproduced, so the soil becomes barren and the area of ​​the former steppe forest.

In this way, humanity loses irretrievably the enormous potential of biodiversity of undiscovered species of flora and fauna. The value of this biodiversity of undiscovered species of flora and fauna occurring in tropical rainforests of the Amazon can be a loss of knowledge important for science contained in this biodiversity and individual organisms of living flora and fauna.

For example, they may be unique biochemical substances produced by living organisms, fauna and also fungi that could be new medicines in medicine, new crops in organic agriculture resistant to specific viral, bacterial, parasite, etc. diseases. it is also knowledge about organic compounds that have not yet been recognized, which could be applied in various branches of industry developed in accordance with the concept of sustainable, pro-ecological development, according to the green economy concept.

In view of the above, humanity loses great potential for the development of science and technology by cutting out natural biological ecosystems, in particular those characterized by high biodiversity of tropical rain forests. Tropical forests and many other natural biological ecosystems as entire ecosystems have evolved over millions of years.

The evolution of millions of years (not only individual species according to Darwinian evolution) but above all the evolution of entire ecosystems analyzed as a process of integrated evolution of thousands or millions of ecologically connected species of flora, fauna, fungi, bacteria and viruses has led to the creation of, for example, tropical Amazonian forest characterized by enormous potential of biodiversity, so huge that many species of living organisms in this wild forest have not yet been recognized.

Many such areas characterized by high biodiversity disappear irretrievably from the Earth's surface. The natural highly biodiverse ecosystems that have been created for millions of years now disappear in a moment, because the appearance of man on Earth in the context of the millennia of evolution of life on Earth is just a moment. Are such activities typical of a rational being?

Is it only lack of knowledge, lack of awareness of societies about how much humanity loses, how much it loses in the potential of science and technology development in the situation of cutting natural highly biodiverse ecosystems that will not be reborn themselves, they will not recreate themselves without the use of huge expenditures, usually much larger than profits from the wood obtained from the forest?

Please reply