Context aware programming is much more dynamic than feature oriented. When you talk about context aware, there is always a possibility to verify the input according to end user may be and do the manipulation and provide the outcome but in feature oriented you have to follow some key attributes to work for and successfully achieve them at the end.

All contexts can be considered as features in context-aware systems, but not vice versa. Because, context information is the dynamically changing information characterizing relevant entities which are relevant to the user-application interaction.

Conference Paper ICAF: A Context-Aware Framework for Access Control

It is also my impression that context-oriented programming encompasses feature-oriented programming in the sense that you could consider (certain) contexts as features, and on the condition that you have a context-oriented language which provides support for declaring (and verifying at run-time) feature-like dependency relations between contexts (as is for example the case in the Subjective-C language). But what about my other questions :

Can feature-oriented programming learn from context-oriented programming to enable for more dynamicity?

Can context-oriented programming take inspiration from feature-oriented programming and software product lines to offer more control and guarantees about the program's dynamic behavior?

Should/will they eventually merge into a single paradigm that takes the best of both worlds?

Conference Paper Subjective-C: Bringing Context to Mobile Platform Programming