Ideally, quantum mechanics, the newest science, should be the most perfect, but unfortunately the opposite is true.
We assume the following five errors are the most common and misleading:
1- QM is not useless but not always understandable.
*In our opinion, incomprehensible means useless.
2-What is the real meaning of the entanglement of two quantum particles in QM?
**To our knowledge, entanglement of the energy density system exists in classical physics in the same way as in QM.
3-What is the role of the Schrödinger equation in physics?
***Brainwashed iron guards claim that SE is suitable for classical and quantum physics at all scales down to interstellar distances, when the truth is that it was invented to solve the atom of hydrogen and describe subatomic systems on intermolecular scales.
4-What is wave collapse and how does it block observation and measurements?
****No comments.
5-Which is the most complete and understandable:
The Schrödinger PDE or its Laplacian square?
***** The majority of mathematicians and physicists do not know what the Schrödinger square PDE is and therefore do not know that the square of SE is more complete and more understandable than SE itself.
Dear Ismail , unfortunately science perusing standard modeling of atom (atom with parts , electron, proton/neutron, quarks, Higgs boson...which up this date none of them observed to this date)
To make story short, perception is, science believes modern mechanical physics can collapse into smaller unit such as atom due to Mr. Einstein energy mass equation,
In additional, our past icons thought that one or two-dimension equation can describe three-dimension of nature, thus our science is in wrong direction. Atoms are the indivisible unit of our universe.
Article Intelligent Atom
Useless quantum mechanics is actually inherent to Schrödinger's PDE since it lives and operates in an incomplete R^4 space where time is not properly defined as embedded in 3D geometry.
We assume that it is time to replace the classical Schrödinger PDE with his square or Laplacian PDE where time is a dimensionless integer embedded in a unitary 4D x-t space.
Schrodinger PDE is a weak and incomplete format for describing quantum particle mechanics.
It is only capable of resolving two body systems.
Assuming that the greatest success of classical Newtonian mechanics was the solution of the Earth-Sun system. Likewise, the greatest success of quantum mechanics, combined with Bohr's postulate E2-E1=hf, was the solution of the electron-proton two-body system.
It is a pity that the mathematical solution of this classical and quantum two-body problem ranks among the greatest achievements of humanity.
Only in chemistry do they have approximate experimental and theoretical results for many quantum particle systems occurring in molecular reactions.
Quantum mechanics as a whole needs a better reformulation.
It is worth mentioning that:
1-The statistical theory of Cairo techniques or any other adequate statistical theory can provide a rigorous solution for the hydrogen atom/particle in a central field without the need for Bohr quantification of the angular momentum mv. 2 Pi r=n h.
2- Max Planck's energy distribution law can be derived from Laplacian's theorem or any other appropriate statistical theorem, without needing Planck's hypothesis of quantifying the energy of quantum oscillators E = n h f.
3-Spontaneous explosions in a vacuum like those recorded in vacuum cleaners, vacuum bombs and the Big Bang are a fact despite the denial of the Schrodinger PDE and its iron guards.
4-The Planck constant itself h = 6.35 E-34 J s can be obtained by other means than by fitting the Planck energy distribution with the Balmer or Lyman spectral series.
etc..
Please take a look at,
Useless Quantum Mechanics – The Complex and Untold Story, ResearchGate, November 2024.
Please take a look at:
Useless Quantum Mechanics – The Complex and Untold Story III
ResearchGate, IJISRT journal.
- Badges
- Science topic