A preprint is a scientific article made available online to the research community by its authors, prior to formal peer review
It depends, really. How I've seen people use it, the most obvious benefit, is to be 'the first' to publish about something, like a new species, a new digging site, a new galaxy... (since you don't have to wait for the review process. this is most useful in highly competitive fields where time is not of essence for discoveries). Also, if you have a yet-unpublished method that yielded really nice results, but making a paper about the method *and* the results would be too much to make an interesting story, you could imagine uploading the method as a preprint, and citing that in the paper.
Also, once it's in a preprint repository you can share it via social media and get feedback from all the peers you'd like, and many journals will still accept the paper for publication.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/benefits_and_usage_of_preprintsorg_for_authors
Next, preprints is well described topic at RG Help Center page:
https://explore.researchgate.net/display/support/Preprints
Other researchers might cite it. But the likelihood of this is low. Researchers usually cite papers that are published after a peer-review—sharing new information with other researchers, as it is the case with research on COVID-19. But again, the benefits to the researcher are not real.
First of all, let us have a look at that category of articles for those who don't know the preprint.
A preprint is a full draft research paper that is shared publicly before it has been published or even peer-reviewed by a given journal or conference. It may have been given a digital object identifier (DOI), and, in turn, it can be cited in other research papers. But, academics usually prefer to read and cite final published versions of journal articles or conferences instead of preprint (e.i. pre-publication works).
I have a different perspective for uploading any preprint anywhere before it has been published. My advice is not put any research anywhere until it is published and tagged with your name.
Why you let others know about your insights and methodologies before publication?
You may say that I am somewhat old-fashioned, but I have a different perspective for uploading any preprint anywhere before it has been published by your name. So, my advice is to not put your research anywhere until it is published.
- Your manuscript may be copied and then published by others before you can do that. This stealing of your paper might be happening. You must wait until the paper is accepted and then published by that journal. Then, upload that research item on any platform you wish.
- You should avoid telling the other researchers about the details of anyone of your papers until it has been published and seeing your name by yourself.
- A journal may have automated plagiarism software to check the paper before admitting it to the reviewing process. There are chances that your paper can get a rejection at any point. Thus, to avoid this problem, don't publish the preprint until you got ACCEPTED and see that it is tagged with your name.
One of my friends was accused of plagiarism; do you know why?
After about three months, his research paper was rejected because of plagiarism. When he checked the journal report, he found that his paper was accused of plagiarism and with a 61% percentage. The reason is that his manuscript was previously uploaded as a preprint. It took him another two months to solve the problem and removing the manuscript from the database of the preprint.
So, in order to solve such this type of issues, it may take several months of following up to remove the manuscript from the database of the preprint. Anyhow, If there were accusations of plagiarism, it is not well for any researcher's reputation, in any meaning.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Atmosphere
- Air