Senior Leaders in higher ed have the power to make and execute changes. Yet, data show that the leaders’ gender, race/ethnicity (Johnson, 2021), inexperience in leadership style, and their predecessors' policies and informal groups (Fagan et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2020; Javeed et al., 2019; Marchiondo et al., 2021) can impact their power/influence in the making decisions or implementing anti-racist policies. This influence continues to adversely affect the Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) geoscientists on campuses and neighboring communities (Wolfe & Riggs, 2017).
What else am I missing?
References:
Guo, Y., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Inclusive leadership, leader identification and employee voice behavior: The moderating role of power distance. Current Psychology, 41, 1301-1310.
Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M., Haque, A., & Rubab, U. (2019). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(4), 554-571.
Johnson, G. (2021). Gender, diversity, and the United States judiciary. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 41(1), 61-71.
Marchiondo, L. A., Verney, S. P., & Venner, K. L. (2021). Academic leaders' diversity attitudes: Their role in predicting faculty support for institutional diversity. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1-10.
Wolfe, B. A., & Riggs, E. M. (2017). Macrosystem analysis of programs and strategies to increase underrepresented populations in the geosciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65, 577-593.