Private education is outcome of need for adopting the changing pedagogy or methods of learning for new world. But basic education upto the primary level is best to be provided by the government to achieve inclusive and equity for fundamental rights of citizens. The access to education cannot be ensured by private education beyond certain income groups and disadvantageous groups. The government has better structure to cope up with the welfare needs to all its constiuents regions or areas than private sector. The community funded private education may be answer to add more benefits of access as well as quality. The nations must try to get private education in higher or technical education where industry -institutional partnership is needed. Even skill development or technical education can be best provided for certification by government hence providing opportunity for all. A mere budget of 3-5 percent may be enough for acheiving primary and skilling population for future. The private sector may also look for building brands, marketing and profits which may deter unless governments enforce equal opportunities principles based on merit or assist students in getting private education.

To conclude private education is service to society yet its limited in accesss hence not advisable for developing nations struggling to bring equity and access as part of larger development goals. I hope you got some hint on your question. Thank you

Thank you so much, Dr. Shanshikant, for your meaningful comments. The conclusion is really a good hint for me. I love your comment on the government's responsibility to ensure basic education for all, without depending on the private. That is what many developed countries have been able to do. One side of private education is service like you said. However, the underlying motive, which is the main priority of the private, should be predictable.