Any good ideas about this subject?
https://www.mdpi.com/topics/9MQYZTDW48
This Topic explores the interplay between topological, quantum, and molecular information structures, and their roles in shaping intelligent computation across both artificial and biological systems. We welcome pioneering theoretical and experimental contributions that draw upon topological quantum computing, braid groups, modular tensor categories, and molecular regulatory mechanisms—including those based on DNA, RNA, and miRNA—to propose novel frameworks for learning, inference, decision-making, and biologically inspired computation.
We also encourage submissions that investigate fundamental physical or algebraic architectures of cognition and natural intelligence, especially those grounded in quantum symmetries, non-Abelian computation, and topological robustness.
The goal is to foster collaboration across quantum physics, mathematics, artificial intelligence, molecular biology, and information theory, with an emphasis on frameworks that integrate logic, structure, and evolution into new paradigms of computation.
Dr. Michel Planat Prof. Dr. Edward A. Rietman Topic Editors
Science positions itself as knowledge based on verifiable facts. Fantasies are hypotheses. Hypotheses can be very different. For example: that in fact we are octopuses of the oceans of Proxima Centauri. And this life of land primates of the solar system is usually dreamed of by us during the mating season.
Nevertheless, now I dream. As always with octopuses of our type. That the brain of a large primate cannot be written into a genome according to the standards of artificial intelligence. At least one and a half million genomes are needed as a minimum (https://www.researchgate.net/post/Darwinism_the_Watson-Crick_hypothesis_and_mathematics_are_they_compatible).
And then the nightmare begins. I dream that this assessment can be told to children at school and they will understand. Because they also know what the capacity of a memory carrier mean. Therefore, evil quasi-squids will not allow this to be taught to children at school.
Might this particular idea be appropriate?:
Preprint Holographic Quantum Neural Networks
It is largely inspired by an observed pattern common to both black hole thermodynamics and "holonomic brain theory," as championed by Karl Pribram in the 80's. The central insight is that if human cognition is holographic in nature, then a holographic model of computation could exhibit advantages for AI that the biological brain has (e.g., energy efficiency, robust representational capacity).
Happy to contribute it to this focus issue, but only if it's considered suitable for the scope and subject matter
Michel Planat
Yes, Logan, it is perfectly appropriate and I hope you will submit. There are several journals in the Topic. I can recommend International Journal of Topology for this subject. Since the journal is still in the launching phase the fees are cancelled.
For those reading this message: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijt
For the other journals fees may be cancelled or reduced depending on the invitations.
For example hereArticle 1991 Variation principle and algorithm of dual functioning: ...
It is well known that in coherent optics of transparent substances with variable refractive index you can organize something similar to learning. And mathematically the same for stationary Schrodinger equation. Maybe doesn't mean it's necessary. Because there is another possibility: to think about who did it before us. Ten billion years earlier.
Hi Victor Okhonin. May be you can prepare a contribution to this Topic? There is much time left.
Dear Michel,
I have been working with these neural networks for quite a long time. Since 1986, when the neural network boom began with independent publications in about 5 different countries. In my case, it was the USSR.
Since the USSR was the most atheistic country at the time: it is logical that, unlike others, I was immediately drawn to religious mysticism. For me, neural networks are a reason to understand theological issues. To refresh their perception. In particular, there is a lot on this topic in my profile here.
At the same time, it does not seem to me that I am going beyond the scope of science. Quite the opposite. When we see even a refusal to please of high school students by the task of how many millions of genomes are needed to record the structure of the brain according to the standards of artificial neural networks: this is already going beyond the scope of science.
Probably, this refusal was initiated by some demons. Since it is clearly not beneficial to the politicians themselves. This undermines their efforts to look religious.
This tends to mean that science is not neutral and independent of the context, resonating with quantum contextuality but at the macroscopic/sociological level. I started to explore this view
https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=TZWl3KsAAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=TZWl3KsAAAAJ:7gg4mBK4JdgC
Do you know a Jesuit or maybe someone from the special services? I am ready to talk to them about the current situation.
Me too. Sometimes I think. That in a Jesuit college it would be better for the students to solve the problem. How many millions of genomes are needed to record the structure of the brain according to the standards of artificial intelligence. And it wouldn't hurt for the secret service employees either. They are the ones who teach presidents. How to feign religiosity.
Okay, the secret services. But I have nothing special against the Jesuits. It's not clear at all. Why is it better for a Jesuit not to know. How many millions of genomes are needed to record the structure of the brain according to the standards of artificial intelligence? What is the meaning of this mystical prohibition? They did nothing bad to me. Once I even wrote an accounting program for the Catholic Diocese of Toronto. On a commercial basis. Everyone paid on time.
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology