To what extent can informal institutions either enhance or impair natural resource rule enforcement? Do they always promote natural resource governance? or can they also impair rule enforcement? Is it a double-edged sword? What are the various conceptualizations of informal institutions as pertains to the natural resource governance context?
in most cases, people may be tempted to view informal institutions as always positive , however, informal institutions may connote at least three different conceptualizations with each having different impact on natural resource governance. see artcitel below.
"Institutional assessment in natural resource governance: A conceptual overview" published in forest policy and economics
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116301654
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India