Pradeep et al,

I don't want to really get involved in your discussions, but really, your paper 'Miracle Equation' - it's a joke, isn't it? You're pulling an Alan Sokal, right?

Time ultimately is an illusion. Read J. Barbour's The End of Time. The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe (1999).

Time measures the evolution of irreversible processes.

About reading your articles, this is a mistake which systematically repeats with new users. People are busy. It's unlikely that somebody would read your articles just because you say so. If you want to make people to become interested in your articles, you have to say in a couple of words, or lines, what is the main idea in those articles. In this way you can also progress with your question.

Best wishes!

 Dear Sofia,

Pls do  refer my peer-reviewed scientific research works in reputed journals as mere articles to be serving for an avid and enthusiastic science, curiosity questioners..Rather they are noetic  and beyond ,in nature.

Regards

Pradeep Koshy

Dear Prandeep,

I had no intention to offend you, please rest assured. Though, highly qualified as your articles may be, my words are still that we, the researchers, are very busy. You know for sure to what amount of material we are exposed and have to get acquainted with.

In explaining in short what is the idea in your article, you guide the people. Some of them would then get into the depth of your articles, others will stay contended, at least for the moment, with your brief explanations. That depends on the particular field of research of the different people.

Again, no intention to underestimate, only to help,

Sofia

Dear Selfie,

 Researchers are busy is not  an excuse for your ignorance on the article. The prudent attitude would have been no comments.

Regards

Pradeep Koshy

Prandeep,

Insults are not wellcome in this site. Neither are they a substitute for scientific arguments.

As to advices of behavior, instead of starting a war it would have been the most practical to follow my advice and present the main ideas of your articles.

Anyway, I wish you that people read your articles, just because you say so.

I, for one, won't read any further messages from you.

Sofia

Before you start accusing, check on your side. You are repeatedly calling me Prandeep.It  is a great abuse in my language.So before you start finding dust in other peoples eyes,remove the plank in one's own. Proverbs Solomon.

P.K.

You speak of ``peer reviewed scientific research in reputed journals''. The General Science Journal, in which your papers are published explicitly states on its site that ``The original and continued purpose of these pages is to provide an opportunity for public presentation of scientific theories without prior and arbitrary assessment, criticism or rejection by the recipient. ''

Without prior and arbitrary assessment: that means *not* peer reviewed. Just trying to keep you at a minimum level of honesty. As to your papers, they are, of course, utter nonsense.

I have to agree with F. Leyvraz on this one.

If you want your research to be taken seriously, you need to learn several things. Firstly, how to write scientifically (and without the "God gave me this amazing talent to save mankind" ego - did you see Einstein, Feynman, etc ever claim themselves to be wonderful within their articles? Nope, they left that for the reader to decide).

Secondly, you should try and get a research degree (MSc or, even better, PhD) and learn how the process of publishing in real journals works. It will help you because you will get the opportunity to publish alongside respected researchers, which will improve your reputation and skill - going it alone is a crazy idea right at the beginning of a career. It will also chip away at your ego.

Finally, wait until you secure yourself a position as a well-respected academic before making claims of brilliance. You have to earn respect, not demand it. In order to get such a position, you need to write in respected journals and get yourself some experience in academia, far beyond a BSc. In order to obtain such a position, you will certainly need to think a little more "down to earth" and prove yourself in the trenches of current physical research. Prove yourself there, and you'll manage to go very far in life. Obsess about trivial mathematical relationships between square numbers and you won't be spending your time wisely.

On one last note, time is most definitely an illusion. Lunch time, doubly so.

I was having discussion. with Sofie ,I presume.Now F, Leyvraz is worried about some of my works being non peer-reviewed. If you need a peer-reviewed journal work of my mine, view the link http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Domain-of-Relativistic-Mechanics.pdf  .Now as a scientist ,don't you recognize , truth is the greatest and important thing in life. Now,Albert Einstein, in which peer-reviewed journals did ,he present ,his work. Secondly, another scientist   Jake,has raised the issue of humility in my works. If you have  read my abstract in the peer-reviewed work of mine, you would never have raised this issue. Again, one should realise Einstein was a polytechnic dropout. His desire was to do,  the coveted electric engineering course. Now, I am an Engineering dropout, but my coveted desire was to do become the famed IITian, but missed it due to chemistry. Humility is for those who deserve it.  If the  famed journals like NATURE,JMP won't publish your works,since one is not an Ivy League professor or equivalent and   they are busy, after begging to them ,what should I do. Now time is not an illusion can be inferred from the link  http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150309-why-does-time-only-run-forwards

http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Domain-of-Relativistic-Mechanics.pdf

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150309-why-does-time-only-run-forwards

This is too easy. In general I don't think it is useful to engage crackpots in discussion, but I do want to remark that the statements by crackpots about Einstein, like the ones you make, are always incorrect. For instance, here is a list of Einstein's publications https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_publications_by_Albert_Einstein many of them in the best (really) peer reviewed real scientific journals of his time. He was not a dropout, and even if he were you would nowhere come close to being his equal just  for that reason. It is also a myth that he was bad at math: https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-Albert-Einstein-failed-in-mathematics-many-times-during-his-school-days  But again, even if he were, that would not make a person who is also bad at math a genius. You, sir, are not a genius.  And claiming that IJSER is a proper peer reviewed journal is rather doubtful: see https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_International_Journal_of_Scientific_and_Engineering_Research_ISSN_2229-5518_a_valid_Journal I'm not going to ask if you can produce a referee report, that would only prolong the agony.

Also, here is a link to the crackpot index: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html Let us know if you can figure out your points, being able to do additions is sufficient. On the basis of your last contribution alone I already got easily to a 100 points.

By the way,  being an:  "Independent Researcher, Career Launcher and American Educational AIDS" is not  "... an Independent Researcher and presently working as a faculty in physics/mathematics in prestigious institutes in Kochi , India"  That is just a plain lie and bad grammar.

Personally I think there are far too many crackpots on RG, fortunately it helps that they usually go away after a while. They never ever make a contribution to real science. They almost never answer a  question and when they do, it is only to promote their crackpot theories.

And yes, I did look at some of your papers, and it is utter bullshit. You did not add anything of value to Pythagoras' theorem, you only show that you do not know the difference in math between "if" and "if and only if". As other people already pointed out, you have no idea how special relativity works. But like all crackpots you don't see your own logical inconsistencies and adhere to your statements  despite careful correction (3 resp. 5 points for each such statement). The biggest mystery is why we actually go through the effort to  point out your mistakes, I guess we can't help ourselves, we try to educate in the fields in which we are experts, and in most cases like to do that. But, judging from your previous responses, that is apparently way beyond your understanding. Claiming that you are a "theoretical physicist extraordinaire" does not make you one, au contraire, it makes you a buffoon.

Sofia  D. Wechsler,

You  claimed

Time measures the evolution of irreversible processes. An irreversible process is a process in which the arrow of time is in the forward direction  only.When one  studies evolution of the same ,it means, Time moves only forwards and not backwards. And the best article regarding the same is 

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150309-why-does-time-only-run-forwards  And do you know,what the conclusion of the above link, Time is not an illusion.I am sorry to copypaste the same link twice,since you have not bothered to read it earlier and you only want to play the role of a spoiler and detractor in a noetic and beyond discussion.As for your second role, playing big sister and or nanny and advising me to present a brief of what I wish to convey, my answer is it is already in the abstract in the peer-reviewed journal in the most humble manner.

Regards

P.K.

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150309-why-does-time-only-run-forwards

Gert Van Der Swan

Your statement:He(Albert Einstein) was not a dropout. Of course ,he was a polytechnic dropout.Time magazine,when awarding him ,Person of the Century,title  did mention he was a polytechnic dropout. If you are able to bring proof to the contrary,I will withdraw from ResearchGate.He also had respect for talented dropouts,when he reflected," I wonder how many potential Einsteins, might have been permanently discouraged through competitive examinations and forced feeding of  curricula". Now some of his publications might have been peer-reviewed.You raised another serious issue,that he was a dunce in mathematics. I have nowhere claimed so.Trying to booby-trap me. Genius claims is, ultimately, emerges from when you revise a genius's work,one might be entitled to the same.But that is not my worry here.Let me present Einstein’s mathematical mistake and its consequence. Pradeep Koshy.The absolutely correct form of the Special Theory Of Relativity equations is t = |γ| t' ,.where t and t' are preconditioned as positive .The mathematical error ,that is there in the time dilation equation is that relativistic gamma constant had two values, one positive and one negative,since it involves a square root function.Hence, the negative value of the same had to be eliminated. So the correction needed, is to enclose the constant,relativistic gamma, in the time dilation  equation  with  the modulus function or absolute value of the same should have been taken..Hence ,even considering (t′)²=(t)²―( tv/c)² is in the strictest sense wrong.Actually, in this equation t′,t, and tv/c are definitely positive.Considering the errors in the time dilation equation.We have allowed γ to be negative.Consequently the errors are t is related to negative of t′, This can happen when t and t′, are of opposite signs.Consider the situation when t is negative in the equation (t′)²=(t)²―( tv/c)²,for tv/c to be positive ,v has to be negative.This I would say this is a gargantuam of error and hence the time dilation equation (t′)²=(t)²―( tv/c)² s terribly riddled with loopholes.Therefore the equation is fundamentally flawed..This equation needs revision     .                        .Let X= t′,Y=t and Z= tv/c where X,Y and Z can assume only positive real values.The time dilation equation gets modified to X² = Y²― Z²in which ,each units and dimensions are same for each term in the equation.Further modified as X=|(AB)^0.5| ,Y= (A+B)/2 and Z= (A-B)/2,here A and B are variables assume numerical values,only positive real values and is identical to the miracle equation.Because miracle equation actually is an algebraic equation (AB)= [ (A+B)/2]²- [(A-B)/2]² Note t′,t, and tv/c, X,Y and Z, AB , (A+B)/2 and (A-B)/2, are all positive. (A+B)/2 and (A-B)/2 are positive implies A>B,A>0.For t>tv/c implies B>0.

Now substitute (A-B)/2=tv/c and A=k.(some arbitrary variable).Therefore B becomes in terms of k and tv/c as

B=(k-2tv/c).Now B>0 implies k-2tv/c>0 results in tv0 ie tv < ck/2 to hold true  viz  t′  and   t should be greater than 1 . Now from the properties of inequalities a0 results in tv0 results in tv

 Have I proved myselves right?https://www.researchgate.net/post/Have_I_proved_myselves_right

From http://biography.yourdictionary.com/articles/how-old-einstein-quit-school.htm

In 1895, at the age of 16, Einstein applied to the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. An entrance examination was required in order to be admitted; but Albert Einstein failed that test. It was suggested that he try his luck at a Swiss school in Aarau. He was accepted there and he continued on with his studies at that institution.

After he graduated from the Swiss school, he was able to get into the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. It was here that he fell in love with the field of physics, the subject area which he is most notably known for.

When he graduated, he had absolutely amazing grades, despite the fact that not too long before he could not even get into the school. He tried to become a professor, but he could not get any jobs in that field. He failed several times and eventually wound up working at the Patent Office in Bern.

In  the book Subtle is the Lord, Pais writes extensively about Einstein in  that school and ends with (p. 45) "So in august 1900, Einstein became qualified as a Fachlehrer...", I assume that even you can understand it means he graduated.

Actually, in the Time article by Carl Sagan you (mis)quote, you can read that "He managed to graduate only because his close friend Marcel Grossmann assiduously attended classes and shared his notes with Einstein." In  addition the quote you give is not from Einstein but from Carl Sagan, and is aimed at the US high school system. It is very unlikely Einstein ever talked about himself in the third person. He was not a crackpot. He never said things like "The bombshell of the 21st century:  An algebraic formula developed by  me" in his papers and that was not because he was living in the 20th. And you want us to believe that the paper in which you claim that was peer reviewed? Another lie. Since you apparently don't understand elementary logic  I'll reiterate and rephrase: even if Einstein dropped out and you also did it does not mean you are a genius, just as it does not prove that you have bushy gray hair, or occasionally stick out your tongue.

You make a big fuss about Prandeep being an insult. I suspect that is a lie as well but  you should at least make sure that you spell other people's names correctly.

Linking to another question in which you congratulate yourself for being right does not make it so. As for the rest, like I said: utter bullshit.

Now keep your promise and leave RG.

Gert

My factual knowledge is Einstein was  a German rebel.He had become a polytechnic dropout,after missing electrical engineering course,which  his uncle,who presented him the compass wanted to pursue.He got disgusted with the Germans and even remarked "  A GOOD GERMAN IS A DEAD ONE". Later he went to Swiss and completed a Bachelor of Physics course.Beyond which I  have no idea.But he was a polytechnic dropout can be inferred from the TIME MAGAZINE publication of 2000,when he was awarded Person of the Century.Now I am also a JEW (genetic lineage)and proud of Einstein.Only thing, I live in India and  is a practicising christian.

 Regards

P.K.

You stated: "If you are able to bring proof to the contrary, I will withdraw from ResearchGate."  So, what are you still doing here?

I don't care what you are or which god or gods you worship, that is totally irrelevant here. However, before you make rash statements about someone or his work (not just "some of his work may have been peer reviewed", really, did you even bother to check the wiki list?) inform yourself a little better. So far you have only shown you have no factual knowledge at all. I doubt very much Einstein made the statement about Germans you quote. One of the hallmarks of a scientist is that he can reference his quotes, and is able to read. Up till now you have shown zero competence in both.

Gert

Please prove Einstein is not a polytechnic dropout with reference to TIME MAGAZINE 2000 issue ,when he was declared Person of the last Century.You are a saboteur in this regard.If you feel discussions are not worth it,ignore it. Don't be a spoiler and detractor of noetic and beyond .discussions.Moreover ,my FaceBook Group SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY has more than 5000 followers in 1 year.the link of which is .https://www.facebook.com/groups/specialtheoryofrelativity2014/  . You cannot cheat all the people all the time.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/specialtheoryofrelativity2014/

You've got to be kidding. But here we go. Here is the link to the TIME article

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,993017-1,00.html

Tell me where in this article you can find the word dropout and you can stay. Otherwise keep your promise and leave RG.

This is what they say about polytechnic:

"At age 15, Einstein staged his first great rebellion. Left behind in Munich when his family relocated to northern Italy after another of his father's business failures, he quit his prep school because of its militaristic bent, renounced his German citizenship and eventually entered the famed Zurich Polytechnic, Switzerland's M.I.T. There he fell in love with a classmate, a Serbian physics student named Mileva Maric."

I've encountered quite a few crackpots over time, but you take the prize.

Even if you discontinue a course , you are known as a dropout,here in India. I think by that yardstick ,Einstein was  a dropout from luipold Gymnaesium school in Germany where he was doing his Diploma or High School. In India,Polytechnic  students are known as Diploma students.  That might be how ,he became a Polytechnic Dropout. Was he really  a one.He joined Zurich Polytechnic Institute.I know he completed a Bachelor in Physics course,but together with it, he got an attachment. ugly Serbian women as his wife,whom he ditched later..When you say, Einstein was 2 years ahead in his studies,here in India also students who qualify exams like IIT are no way backward. Now TIME MAG. reported he was a polytechnic dropout,but then it is 16 years of memory.

You are truly grasping at straws. He quit a Gymnasium, which nowhere would be called a Polytechnic. He then entered the Zurich Polytechnic and did not drop out of that. So he is not a polytechnic dropout and you are an unconscionable liar, and beyond.

Let us not deviate from my research works, which has now completed 500 reads  in 1 year and ever increasing. When Einstein, invented the theory of relativity,only 3 people in the world understood. A theory which revises the same  will have the same fate. Let not scoundrels and cracks obstruct the path.

Pradeep, F. Leyvraz already made it clear that  you have no leg to stand on, so I won't add my two cents about that. There is no mention of dropout and/or polytechnic anywhere in the article you claimed several times it is in. So here is the deal: you either leave RG as you promised, and concentrate on acquiring facebook likes by which you think you can settle scientific debates, or from now on I will follow every post and every question from you with the following text:

Pradeep Koshy is a liar and a fraud. He believes god gave him a way to make three numbers out of two, and in that way overthrow special relativity for objects heavier than 1 kg. However, he knows nothing about number theory, special relativity, the life of Einstein, or the way science is done.  It is no use to engage him in discussion as the link shows.

I will also write a review on amazon about your book, where you claim you are "an Independent Researcher and presently working as a faculty in  physics/mathematics in prestigious institutes in Kochi , India".

Gert

You are not an authority.You have not even read all my four papers 1. PYTHAGORAS THEOREM DECODED 2. MIRACLE EQUATION OF SOLVING 3 VARIABLES IN A SINGLE EQUATION 3. DOMAIN OF RELATIVISTIC MECHANICS 4. COMPREHENSIVE REVISION OF SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY.   It will take atleast a month to read these papers, analyse it and then verify it. You have not made a persistent effort in evaluating the same.Then you want to make the comments.Now based on the first 2 papers,I can create questions and toss it at you. Are you ready.So as to test whether you have read atleast these 2 simple papers of mine .Based on these answers,you will be caught redhanded. 

 Your statement :He believes god gave him a way to make three numbers out of two, and in that way overthrow special relativity for objects heavier than 1 kg.

You are distorting matters  above. Here you should be criminally accountable. There is an equation that I derived, named it Miracle Equation,since it is capable of solving 3 variables in a single equation,conventionally impossible. As a consequence or its application in special theory of relativity implies,domain of relativistic mechanics is one-third the speed of light in contrast to Einstein's or currently accepted value of speed of light. Of course, it comes with a precondition,it is only applicable to masses greater than 1kg and time events greater than 1s. The file is attached below

Pradeep Koshy is a liar and a fraud. He believes god gave him a way to make three numbers out of two, and in that way overthrow special relativity for objects heavier than 1 kg. However, he knows nothing about number theory, special relativity, the life of Einstein, or the way science is done. It is no use to engage him in discussion as the link shows.

see https://www.researchgate.net/post/Time_isnt_an_illusion_why

My review of the book on amazon will follow shortly. And here is a funny thing I just noticed: the facebook group you mentioned is public, so expect some posts there as well.

Gert: If you keep repeating the rubbish,temporarily you may be able to silence me. You are not the authority here. There are intelligent  ones out there and can conclude matters. Even in India, more than anytime in the past, there is great scientific awakening and they will be the best  to  judge in these matters. Rather leave it to them than being an European bigot.

Talking about rubbish. Since you have not left, I can check one thing with you in preparation for my book review (I don't want to do the same as you and make unsubstantiated claims): of which prestigious institutions in Kochi are you a faculty member? Certainly not of CUSAT (unless you are Prof. Moly P. Koshy but her picture suggests otherwise) and none of the Colleges in Kochi with a website (and I expect that a prestigious institution has at least a website) gives a Mr P. Koshy as member of faculty in any department let alone physics and mathematics. Do you even have a PhD? Which is sort of a minimum requirement for a faculty member at any university or prestigious college that I know of. I'm sure you don't. I doubt very much given your ego that you would call yourself Mr if you actually were a Dr, but nevertheless I thought I'd check.

PS: This escalated rather quickly didn't it? You should have taken Sofia's, Jake's, and Leyvraz's advice.

I am only a part time faculty of a  premium coaching institute  CAREER LAUNCHER ,the website CL Educate Pvt. Ltd..It is one of the best institutes in India. If Moly P. Koshy is  a faculty of CUSAT, I will go and meet her and discuss her about my theory. Since we are of the same religion,she may be kind to me.Let me narrate my earlier experience with CUSAT.   I contacted Head of Dept. of CUSAT and mentioned my discussing my theory of modified relativity with them. They gave an appointment with relativity expert of CUSAT. At some point, I was not allowed to discuss further,he opined Lorentz transformation was confirmation of special relativity.. This after even presenting the link http://www.toequest.com/forum/relativity/5553-domain-relativistic-mechanics.html  where even Americans have no problems in accepting in thousands.Now my crooked brain took an alternative approach. I again contacted the relativity expert,this time,wanted to be cleared of a doubt that whether pythagoras theorem is involved in special relativity. He took one week's time and answered in the negative.Now this is the standard of relativity expert of CUSAT.  Now, I enquired about the same in a professor in an average college here and he anwered it was. But people won't  accept him. Now actually I could be nominated for the INFOSYS SCIENCE PRIZE. But these colleges won't do it. They are ready to nominate me and this is the link http://www.infosysblogs.com/infosysprize/2015/12/the_gps_in_your_smart_phone_an.html#comments  Now my theory  may be mathematics based and physicists are incapable of certifying it.

So indeed you are not faculty member at any prestigious institution while claiming you are at several in math and physics departments. I'm sure they call that also  in India what it is: lying.

PS. And if you really think that "They are ready to nominate me" on the basis of the link you gave,  I suggest seeking help from a psychiatrist

I   am  not  professor/ faculty of any academic institution like CUSAT. However I  have played the role of faculty in prestigious coaching institutions like CAREER LAUNCHER,TIME,IMS   .Again to check if I could be nominated for INFOSYS SCIENCE PRIZE,  I  will provide the mobile number of science division manager,  Mrs Bhavna Mehra  ie+91--9945529335.You personally can call her and verify.

Faculty: the group of teachers in a school or college

Several: more than two but not very many.

This is not worth my time. I'll be gone for a few days, in the mean time I'll write a book review  for your book on amazon, and if you are not gone from RG by tuesday I will post it. If you are nominated I won't bother you anymore, you can piss off other people with your nonsense,  and I will consider it a low point for Indian science.

"I played role" reminds me of a guy who wrote books on UFO's and extraterrestials and suggested strongly he worked at some observatory. I think his name was Adamski. Turned out he had a hotdog stand outside that institution.

If some college nominates me,which is  highly  unlikely  due to anti-semitism. . Those are privileges denied outside the academic fraternity which Einstein,Ramanujam had. enjoyed,I would presume.  But  the   peer-reviewed journal in which  my research work is presented is recognised by them ie INFOSYS,  they have no problem in considering me for the prize.

Let me throw  a different challenge, based on my theory,here.. Elon Musk or any other hero or organisation , in this lifetime, is not going to build a rocket ,that can travel  faster,  than one-third the speed of light,. Does anyone in the world ,a pure relativist wants to take this challenge. Let us wait one generation, that means 25-30 years.for the same.

Gert

I would ask you to watch Dr. Ravi Zacharias YouTube videos, one of which he declares:Some of the greatest scoundrels of the world are the most educated people.You certainly belong to that class.

Nobody is going to build a rocket going faster than c/3 anytime soon: finally one thing on which we can agree.

However, there are relativistic jets expelled from the center of active galaxies. Their speed is close to c (hence much larger than c/3) and they have masses much larger than 1kg.

Finally, some quite uneducated people can be obnoxious fools. You might reflect on the reasons why you should not be reckoned among those.

 F. Leyvraz : Your statement: However, there are relativistic jets expelled from the center of active galaxies. Their speed is close to c (hence much larger than c/3) and they have masses much larger than 1kg.

But then their  mass  does not turn into infinitely large   as relativity predicts. To my knowledge these are streams of subatomic particles like electrons and protons,which  is less than 1kg ,which has  already been explained by me. This link below will clarify the same https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_jet  My theory could have been shattered had the fastest particle in the universe had exceeded my cosmic speed limit...Pls check the link for getting convinced    http://www.universetoday.com/127844/18-billion-solar-mass-black-hole-rotates-at-13-speed-of-light/   Also the.let us observe the future experiment http://www.visiontimes.com/2016/02/23/no-nasa-wont-get-humans-to-mars-in-3-days-heres-what-you-need-to-know.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook 

Can you give me one solitary example of a particle of 1 kg or more, which is not made of protons or electrons?

F.Leyvraz  But you didn't answer the first part.If you are considering that as a mass greater than 1kg instead of a subatomic particle which I do,then it presents an even bigger problem.Why that mass  does not tend to infinity  .   So     relativity   fails is that your opinion.

Sofia

Pls check the past posts, the insults are highly offensive and was first adopted by the other person.Mine was only riposte in this regard. Again when you take mattters to a higher level,do you agree with  noetic conclusions upto now. Or you are again playing the role of a spoiler and detractor.This is the maximum polite approach, I can be regarding you.

Regards

P.K.

Much as I am interested in time, I'm not going to discuss it on this thread, That would only give the illiterate nitwit and arrogant bigot Pradeep more opportunity to spout his nonsense. It is never of any use to engage a crackpot. His errors have been pointed out, he does not listen, it is a waste of time. Apparently  he does not leave RG as promised, the only proper reaction is to ignore him.

Gert

You are not an authority.You have not even read all my four papers 1. PYTHAGORAS THEOREM DECODED 2. MIRACLE EQUATION OF SOLVING 3 VARIABLES IN A SINGLE EQUATION 3. DOMAIN OF RELATIVISTIC MECHANICS 4. COMPREHENSIVE REVISION OF SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY.   It will take atleast a month to read these papers, analyse it and then verify it. You have not made a persistent effort in evaluating the same.Then you want to make the comments.Now based on the first 2 papers,I can create questions and toss it at you. Are you ready.So as to test whether you have read atleast these 2 simple papers of mine .Based on these answers,you will be caught redhanded. 

Pradeep et al,

I don't want to really get involved in your discussions, but really, your paper 'Miracle Equation' - it's a joke, isn't it? You're pulling an Alan Sokal, right?

Einstein attended the Luitpold Gymnasium, where he received a relatively progressive education. The gymnasium prepares pupils to enter a university. In Germany, for instance, pupils study subjects like German, maths, physics, chemistry, geography, biology, arts, music, physical education, divinity, history and social sciences. They are also required to study at least two foreign languages (the combination of English and Latin or English and French being the most popular). In the 12th and 13th grade students prepare for the Abitur, an examination required in order to go on to a university.

He quit a year and a half prior to final examinations without telling his parents, convincing the school to let him go with a medical note from a friendly doctor, but this meant that he had no secondary-school certificate.

Although he excelled in the mathematics and science part of entrance examinations for the Federal Polytechnic Institute in Zurich his failure of the liberal arts portion was a setback; his family sent him to Aarau, Switzerland to finish secondary school, and received his diploma in September 1896.

Einstein subsequently enrolled at the Federal Polytechnic Institute in October and moved to Zurich. In 1900, Einstein was granted a teaching diploma by the Federal Polytechnic Institute.Although he was named Time magazine's "Man of the Century," Albert Einstein was not an "Einstein" in school. The Nobel Prize-winning physicist, famous for his theory of relativity and contributions to quantum theory and statistical mechanics, dropped out of high school at age 15. Deciding to continue his education a year later, Einstein took the entrance exam to the prestigious Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, but failed. He returned to high school, got his diploma, and then passed the university's entrance exam on his second attempt.

 .  For me dropouts could be genius and not despicable for me.

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/06/28/483805061/has-physics-gotten-something-really-important-really-wrong?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160629

Why experts  get   it  all wrong.    http://www.theweek.in/columns/Anita-Pratap/experts-get-it-all-wrong.html

http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2016/06/28/483805061/has-physics-gotten-something-really-important-really-wrong?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160629

http://www.zmescience.com/science/isotropic-universe-61127/