It seems that only independent researchers dare to write anything about the establishment. It is a big problem that none of the researchers who work in academia challenge the establishment. Because there are so many aspects of physics that a reasonable person cannot accept. It has been written about this several times but nothing happens!

Jan Slowak Hellow. Since you are not a physicist, I did not expect you to be updated with the developments in the field.

I wonder how the younger generation of physicists picked up on your theses? In my opinion, your 8T idea lacks philosophical depth. See an alternative to the 8T idea

Preprint Mathematical Notes on the Nature of Things (fragment)

Dear Ohad,

very well summarized to the point of todays issues with physics (in special) and science (in general)!

Progress in physics as of today is indeed not „only about equations, it's also about influence and Leadership“ with factual power of social media (influencers) and hence rise of importance of platforms like very positive ResearchGate to push back traditional peer-review out of relevance in the long run, while design and direction of earlier also promising attempts like esp. arXiv in the end doing way more harm than good in form of clustering and cementing scientific lock-in even more.

However - physics (and science in general) - is hopefully also in such promiding future not just an outcome of the best „marketing“, or who is able to shout loudest (and in this sense most clever manipulative marketing).

With respect to your important point made above replying „1. How many SM free parameters your notes produced ?“ please allow me to hint you (all) in form of RG typical form of marketing (I have critizised before) to iSpace theory as presented in my RG home, able to derive most but all constants of nature from simple first order multiplicative integer geometric input of GoldenRatio, Euklidean-Pi, changed distance definition based Pi3=3 and small integers like derived quantum of time to be 1/6961 iSpaceSecond in novel fully human artefact free iSpace-IQ (and in addition related fully lab compatible iSpace-SI) unit system using V (Volt), A (Ampere), s (second) and m (Meter) only.

The results of iSpace are not only a leap-frog way to calculate constants of nature in exact symbolic form and with this to generate arbitrary precision numerical results for constants, it’s more so a precise symbolic toolkit written in Mathematica (Wolfram Language) to handle iSpace intrinsic inter-constant relations (10D LEGO style model), but with such verify also near any other physical theory like your own using the power of symbolic introspection of result equations (and path to) normally available in few digits measurement result precision only (limited mainly by Newtonian G to 4-5 digits at best).

The really simple yet extremely effective reductionist approach of iSpace hence helped to reduce the number of SM free model parameters from (about) 21 to very few remaining, mostly by showing that a hidden unknown as of yet very deep inter-constant relation exists between all of those on the mathematically most simple integer numeric level to the power of exponents of 4 base units V,A,s,m given (e.g 10*(1+111111+1)) is the integer electron mass value in iSpace-IQ units).

Sorry for my lengthy contribution, but I was equally hooked by the not only verbal power of your question asked - much more of the new generation being like you ist required - and in the shortest possible time to finally get actual progress back to physics (in special) and science (in general).

Keep up your good work,

Christian