Balochistan has been seeking their Right since the formation of Pakistan

I explained in my book Reiterating Unspoken. Available from Waterstones.

Greening Baluchistan would make great sense.

Dear Fatema Miah,

Thank you for sharing your perspective. While I respect your personal views and understand the historical and political grievances that may underlie such sentiments, I must admit that I find it difficult to fully reconcile such explicit calls for the disintegration of a sovereign state with the principles of constructive academic dialogue.

History offers numerous examples—such as South Sudan, Kosovo, South Ossetia, Chechnya, or Donbas—where secessionist movements have led not to peace and prosperity, but to prolonged violence, instability, and humanitarian crises. In fact, there are very few cases where breakaway regions have evolved into stable and thriving nations.

It is also important to remember that the future of any state, including Pakistan, should be determined by its citizens through peaceful and democratic means, not through external pressure or intervention. The breakup of a country is never a purely theoretical proposition—it often entails bloodshed, forced displacement, and large-scale destruction. In the specific case of Pakistan, one must also consider the serious risks associated with the potential destabilization of a nuclear-armed state.

For these reasons, I find such appeals to partition deeply problematic—perhaps even irresponsible and provocative—in light of the potential consequences for regional and global security.

I offer these reflections not to dismiss the issues you raise, but to advocate for greater caution, nuance, and responsibility in our public and academic discussions.

Kind regards,

Oleksandr Veretilnyk

Oleksandr Veretilnyk,thank you for coming forward to add your opinion, you are welcome.

Your points are well valid :

1 determination through citizens, Right point and democratic core guy expressed, though, there the people of the region are the citizen been threated low, with oppression a d been neglected by the mainstream Pakistan.

2 bloodshed, it has been ongoing since made of Pakistan. Therefore, the regional people have been crying out for their freedom, since they hadn't given due rights.

3 Nuclear power, yes, Pakistan had been threatening in many directions with their nuclear power, fur a long time. Pakistan is known risk to global security. There Iran, is. Way bigger nuclear master on the the side of Balochistan people. Our global security is not in place, with USA and Russia conflict, in the 1st place. There north Koria, is a worse threat and u predictable.

Balochistan's unsettled state, their suffer has been done what worse than or equal to Palestine, and our wold focused only on Palestine as a international matter because of the Israelis are Zionists abusing power over Muslims. Arab region had been given priority because of the oil assets, whee Asia been neglected a d some tribes have been under gross - suffering of oporesion, a d had been neglected.

Talking about Freedom of Rights is also academic responsibility and that is International relationship matter, as the global interest.

Nuclear power states cannot be given rights of to threat with nuclear over Freedom of Rights of speech.

Nuclear power advancement is out global skilled - material productions for positivity, and if as the last resort needed to be used in protection, should not be exercising for threats, destruction, and destroying, devastating killing.

Our voice should matter and we must voice. I appreciate your opinion. Welcome again.

Regards,

Dr Author Fatema Miah

Stephen I. Ternyik,

Balochistan, Wajiristan with POK region, and small Sind region seeking freedom.

Then Pakistan with its nuclear and terror-hub looks like will elect as the remain-stan.

Jinnah and some few other played bad trick, making Pakistan, tortured many, deprived lots and lots of groups.

Fatema

It appears you're expressing concerns about the complex and often contentious history of the region encompassing Balochistan, Waziristan, the PoK (Pakistan-Administered Kashmir), and parts of Sindh. These areas have experienced long-standing struggles related to autonomy, resource control, and political representation. The formation of Pakistan in 1947 involved intricate negotiations and, some argue, decisions that have led to grievances among various groups.

Historically, figures like Muhammad Ali Jinnah played pivotal roles in the creation of Pakistan, but the subsequent political developments and policies have been a source of frustration and conflict for many communities. Issues such as regional autonomy, human rights, economic disparities, and security concerns remain central to the ongoing debates about the region's future.

It's important to approach these topics with sensitivity Fatema Miah and an understanding of the diverse perspectives involved. Many groups seek greater autonomy or independence, citing historical grievances, cultural identity, and economic marginalization. The path forward involves complex negotiations, respect for human rights, and inclusive governance to address these longstanding issues.

Stephen I. Ternyik, Jinnah unnecessary been given credits for Pakistan making. Jinnah neither made Pakistan nor planned the geography of it.

Jinnah was adamant for the ruler position he was keenly talking about his position in India after British to be leaving India. Jinnah from nowhere, took hope for a leadership position in India, where neither he was in Muslim League, nor Jinnah did any work for the Indian Muslims basic rights.

Muslim was Bengalis' it was made in Bengali by Bengali and for the general peasants rights.

At a point the momentum turned towards to the West, after the Punjabi Sikh- Hindu of Gaddar party been fighting for their rights there were brutally oppressed. The Bengali congress few stood up voiced fur them. Rest Ghamdi, Nehru, Patel and other left them unsupported, ignored them.

Bengali Muslims few had though about the mas killing of Punjabi youths, The Bengali Muslims voiced for the justice,appealed that the youths of Punjabis must be treated kindly.

The Punjabi and Peshawari learnt about the Muslim league a prominent, and respected organisation Muslim league. That's where Ali and jumped in.

Then from there on they high jacked the party with trick. They invited Bangali leaders been running the party for 40 plus years,..

A lot more to ...

I wrote in my book Reiterating Unspoken. Available from Waterstones.

The pushton were totally out of it . Jinnah, came in later at the last stage , invited by Alis relative, to push out by trick , Fazlul Haque. And Karim the Bengali leaders been providing support to the peasants of both Muslims and Hindu, kept conflicts controlled and supporting a d liaising to British government, via Congress ..

My grandfather fathers father uncle fathers brother dedicated their life for maintaining peace, serving justice in collaboration with the British government. From there on they came to UK.

Regards

Fatema Miah

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351745437_British_Empire_withdrawal

Does "history repeat itself"?

Or the historical chapters are flipped over, over and again, my phrase.

Fatema

Fatema Miah

Dear Professor,

Thank you for initiating this discussion.

Baluchistan needs independence and one day that will be achieved. Though, there is a threat to that. If Baluchistan becomes independent, then one more terrorist nation may come into existence.

Regarding Kashmir, I may sound biased. Kashmir is the crown of India. It will remain the crown of India.

Best regards,

Anamitra.

Dear Fatema Miah ,

Thank you for your thoughtful and detailed response. I truly appreciate the opportunity to continue this exchange of views in a respectful and academic spirit. That said, I must respectfully disagree with the comparison between the situation in Balochistan and that of Palestine. These are two fundamentally different cases, both legally and politically:

While I share your concern that all regions and peoples deserve justice, dignity, and human rights, I do not believe that calling for the dismantling of an entire sovereign state is a constructive solution. Pakistan, like many countries, faces internal challenges, but its problems should be addressed through democratic processes and inclusive dialogue, not through armed separatism.

Indeed, many of the attacks attributed to Baloch separatist groups have involved violence against civilians, including foreigners. It is difficult to see how such tactics would lead to a more just or peaceful society.

Thank you again for your openness to dialogue. I hope that we, as scholars, can continue to promote careful, responsible, and evidence-based discussions about conflict, justice, and self-determination—without losing sight of the broader risks associated with destabilizing already fragile regions.

Kind regards, Oleksandr Veretilnyk

Dear Anamitra Roy,

Thank you for sharing your views. I would, however, like to respectfully raise a couple of concerns.

First, I believe we should be very careful with terms such as “terrorist nation.” There is no such thing as a “terrorist people” or “terrorist nation” in international law or academic discourse. Terrorism is a tactic, not an identity — and to associate it with an entire population is both dangerous and unjust.

Second, I noticed what may appear to be a contradiction in your position. You seem to support the idea of independence for Balochistan but firmly oppose the same for Jammu and Kashmir, calling it “the crown of India.” Yet, if we apply the principle of self-determination consistently, it should be valid for all peoples — not selectively, depending on political preferences.

Would it not be more coherent to support peaceful, democratic solutions to both issues, and to respect the will of the people involved, regardless of geography?

With kind regards,

Oleksandr Veretilnyk

Anamitra Roy,

Welcome and thank you for your valid points of opinion.

Kashmir Indias crown, in saying so you do need to not fear of anything, right in saying such. Geographically being at the top, with all the its mountainous. greenery, philosophically, makes it crown.

From the dispute perspective, also Kashmir is Crown of India from the historical landmark, furthermore, from the partition territorial sm, There where the mistake has been made with misunderstanding not been clarified neither there was any discussion with plan.

Making of Pakistan in my opinion was wrong I cannot see Right there. As I explained my view in my books.

About Pushton, you are right saying such, in the past they shown their malicious natured disgraceful cruel animal-like behaviour in East Bengal in 1971, where Pakistani Military Martial Law Government called Pushton for volunteering in the war against East Bengali civilians. The pushton men were worse evil,, Shame, black stain to human and Shane to Muslims.

It was the Punjabi officers, some officers from Karachi they spoke out, and after, years later their voices, complaints against evil Pakistani power at the time, had been coming out. Truth speaks out after all.

When we are talking about Pushton, a point you raised must be looked at. Pushton must be kept under international observation and to be educated on their own land in making of their country, for they not to become a terrorist state.

After all, they all, the other regions also, have right of their freedom from Pakistan. Pakistan anyway, is not making them any good, where Pakistan is terrorism factory.

Regards

Dr Author Fatema Miah

https://youtu.be/Kj6VGpeFlxE?si=4VYC8tY2Xu_qeU_U

My heart -felt, best best wishes for Imran khan and his lives ones. It will s very sad, and it looks s of course unacceptable such political power abuse in political rivalry.

Regards,

Dr Author Fatema Miah.

Dear Fatema Miah,

Thank you for your continued engagement and for sharing your perspective.

However, I would like to express concern regarding the language used in reference to the Pashtun people and the state of Pakistan. While it is entirely legitimate to criticize specific policies, actions, or historical events — especially those resulting in human suffering — I believe it is essential to avoid generalizing such criticism to entire ethnic groups or national populations.

Referring to any people as “evil,” “a black stain,” or inherently violent risks crossing the line into hate speech. Similarly, labelling a sovereign state as a "terrorism factory" delegitimizes complex political realities and can reinforce harmful stereotypes, which are contrary to the values of academic and humanistic discourse.

As scholars, I believe we have a responsibility to uphold principles of fairness, nuance, and mutual respect — even, and especially, when discussing contentious issues. While many of us may not agree with the policies of the Pakistani state (or any other government), we must distinguish between regimes and the diverse communities that live within them.

Lastly, I want to respectfully note that such generalizations, if left unchallenged, can perpetuate division and hinder the possibility of peaceful, constructive dialogue — which I believe is what we are ultimately striving for.

With kind regards,

Oleksandr Veretilnyk

Oleksandr Veretilnyk, welcome again for adding your view.

Your English Comprehension do not seem to be on the History philosophy expression level at all.

You are not reading well, or your translation is not correct precise translating.

It is a stain in human history , in the modern days how and what they did in 1971. I talked about exactly who did what. Shame on Muslims for what Pakistani military did and had been doing .

Learn to read and understand 1st please.

Regards

Dr Author Fatema Miah

Jinnah was not good, his had bad greed, Seked power.

Jinnah was not intelligent as much, neither thoughtful, or not even considerate. Jinnah had no ibuprofen w of geography or demographic groups, cultures and environmental weathering understanding. British governors were very in every aspects, they learnt, observed and applied the knowledge.

Jinnah wanted a handkerchief size pakistan, Mourana Aza could let all Muslims areas to go out..

After all here is time coming, there to be handkerchief size pakistan.

Regards,

Dr Author Fatema Miah

Oleksandr Veretilnyk

Dear Professor,

Thank you for your opinion.

I am an Indian Bengali. My family (father's side) originated from a place called Myemansingh which is today in Bangladesh. My mother's ancestors were from a place called Noakhali which is today in Bangladesh. My father's and mother's ancestors were rich and belonged to the ruling class. They were driven out of their native place by murdering and looting them. I was not born in that era. However, memories of those carnage are still fresh in minds of the senior family members. We were driven out. We were killed. We were thrashed for no fault of ours. So, when I speak about those people or the descendants of those people, I am biased. That's why, we identify those people as 'terrorist people'. They are still now making my countrymen bleed everyday. I know that I am biased.

Regarding the Kashmir problem, local people (a significant number) want to be with India. It was decided that Kashmir will be a part of India. It is our hostile neighbor who are creating the problem by bleeding my countrymen. So, Kashmir is the crown of India. So, Mazzini's theory of rights of self determination cannot be applied here. Our hostile neighbor has occupied a part of our territory which is being called POK. Our government has said clearly that we want it back.

The problem is that in some states, terrorism is a state sponsored policy. For considerable length of time, this was neglected by many western nations as a local problem. Now, that when they are getting harmed, they have realized or are realizing that it is not a local problem. It is a global problem.

India has been a victim of terrorism. Its fine to read about it in newspapers. Its fine to listen to news. But, when one becomes a victim, then a different perspective is generated. My country is a victim of terrorism. I am a victim of terrorism. And, I can't forget that my ancestors were victims of terrorism.

Best regards,

Anamitra.

Oleksandr Veretilnyk,

Welcome again with your comment of opinion.

Freedom of speech should not be restricting stating the experienced saga, otherwise cruelty becomes devastating, this is when cruelty gets empowered and victimisation get worse. Be it abusing Israeli military and government on Palestinians civilians, the Pakistani military and Pakistan makers power cravers, or the illegitimate power abuser/s government, if it is like Saddam, Hitler, Gaddafi, Yahiya Khan or Recent Seikh Hasina, there is Kim also and many more across the wold.

The victims should not be restricted in word. It is the perpetrators must be limited and to be oppress, as soon as possible.

Imran Khan of Pakistan, jailed, for what?

Do you have an answer ?

Fatema

The people of Pakistan, the citizens and foreigners are often 90% not happy about Pakistan governing, dealings and corruption and power play.

The Pakistani people do well individually, in their own clan, yes there will s clan system with high discrimination amd conflicts among withing Pakistan between the groups.

Regards

Fatema Miah.

Dear Anamitra,

I am very much in understanding with your shared lineage experience. I am same along the line, despite there is a huge difference between your upbringing situation created than mine.

I can understand you do have feeling of had to face and seen some little different - treated or even a mild touch of separatism kind of in West Bengal for not being/having an ancestral background there.

Where, I had high bumpy roller coaster childhood.

British by Birth Bengali ethnic, ( it was the category formerly) some part of Childhood in Bangladesh, there where were people most among the people were low natured majority of corrupted psychology, caused by Pakistan sm, left Bangladeshis hostile, and looting and corrupted, they been looting my family and applied their corruption skills on my family, all different ways. Suffering was too painful, of seeing my things, our family stuffs were always looted.

In UK, here was high discrimination, those days, and low treatment to Asians. Though, Pakistanis those days were not good socially. I will not explain in this much. Later on as we grew up, It changed and Pakistani began to be friendly. We were associated with Indians before.

My family were Raj lineage. After all became Muslims, British looted the restored gold and gems. Vast amount of land the family distributed voluntarily.

Then remaining gold and some more land has been spent on for Muslim League for the rights of poor Hindu and mainly for the Muslim Peasants.

The Kashmiri Muslims came through, into Bangladesh, (like sharawardy like,) many more, are in Sylhet, stayed on my ancestral land, free, like gypsies, they walk in and stay in anywhere.

The current bad beings, those been hurting me , are the same evil ancestral those were on our mercy and they deceived/ caused suffering to my family and others. Some among them in open been torturing people. Like your shared experiences.

I am awaken shocked, Amanita. In 2023, I came to know,the evils I thought were, in the changing world people are bad, no, it is not the case. They were generational passing on, down to todays world, they are the same evils, they were and are been trained as such, and they have been targeting, me and my family. They been doing same to many others.

I came to know, I am an only living female birth of Raj lineage family, in the last 130 years, (so far). The bad ones knew, I did not know. I only knew I am a British Muslim. Yes, I was aware of my family line was off Raj, Brahman, once upon a time, like a fairy tale. Yes, I had some experience of vaguely some high treatment of respect to me as child. I gave no notice, nor importance to when I was addressed as princess, because I did not live in a castle.

On the other hand, the Pakistan making and the deception did hurt my grandfather and almost devastatingly worse than killed my uncle, Maulana alhaj Guljar Ali, my dearest uncle Much more dear than my own father to me, he who dedicated his entire youthhood, whole life for Muslim league, for Muslim league's sake he went to British war too.

The bad ones did not do anything let alone to sacrifice, they are well interlinked, with bad Pakistani and bad Afghanistani people in UK, and carrying on with bad of all kinds to many people and groups.

Simply,

Fatema