The Pangaea Broke up billions of years ago but the South Pole didn't move from it's original position? To my knowledge?
Biologically the Pangaea super-continent should be the most interesting object of study. Especially the southern part. The South Pole had separated from Pangaea Africa is very close to the South Pole. Africa where predominantly the human race came from. Is it a coincidence that Africa on the south pole are very close and at the same time they both harbor very interesting facts. Whereas Africa the human race came from predominantly and the South Pole did not move from its original position as did the rest of the continents. How old is the living cell? Is it older then The Break-Up of Pangaea? And why did the most intelligent continued living organism the humans came from Africa the nearby neighbor to the South Pole before The Break-Up of Pangaea? Did the humans come from the same oldest continuously living cell lines on Earth? If so deduced from the history all of the continents? How about bio-mimicry? Let's take skin color for example? Longitudinal bands of weather decides the skin color or how close the surface of the Earth to the sun on average? Did the format of the landscape of Africa with relations to the South Pole and the oceans influence who we Are? i.e. the logical physical laws and biochemistry produced us? Please, remember, I tend to think that logical vacuum is the role and matter, us, these tiny little wave-particles duality, most of the atom is vacuum, is the exception? And elements of the vacuum have proved logical so the reflection, us, very small wave-particles duality, most of the atom is vacuum, matter is, by necessity, also logical? Especially when this logical vacuum is encompassing us? Before the break up of Pangaea, Africa is in the middle between the US continents and India and Australia, and immediately North of the South Pole and South of north-western Asia and South-West of
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Automotive Engineering
- Machines