Which option is most moral?

The long term consequences of the Mexican-American War of 1848 was the annexation of the northern half of Mexico. This (formerly Mexican) land became the states of Arizona, Utah, Nevada, and California. Today, the people living in these lands enjoy a material existence far superior to those people left in Mexico. So the moral questions we might ponder are:

Had the USA not annexed the northern half of Mexico, would the people of that country be living far better than they do now and would Mexico (twice as large as it is now) be far closer to the USA in military strength and GDP?

Or

If California, Nevada, Utah and Arizona remained part of Mexico, would all the people in those states be living in conditions close to that of the other Mexican people today?

Finally, would both the people of Mexico and those of USA be better off today had the USA annexed the entire Mexican nation in 1848?

More Stephen Martin Fritz's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions