The density of space (medium) can change the speed of light. E.g., “A low density at the edge of a spherical universe would stretch the space (causing energy to be dense again.!).” But we can try to find an initial constant, which we can use to connect the ratios of the universe with the standard constants. E.g., A universal ratio in dimensional structures (fine-structure constant) and a Planck Constant.
The Fine-structure constant (α) with reduced Planck h (α = (X)/ħ) = 1/137 or 0.007297351. But, ħ=h/2π, h/ħ = 6.283185311. So the h makes α = 0.007297351 × 6.283185311 = 1/22. Isn’t it particles? 1:22:1==24?). Isn't it the unitless fundamental constant that is based on the fundamental structure of particles?
The Standard Model has 9 unique and fundamental particles (Higgs particle, 4 Fermions, 4 Bosons). But “experiments show 19 extra parameters that need to be applied for the theory by hand (E.g., adding masses, charges, etc.) *(19)”. Likely, there are around 19 particles hidden between the 9 elementary particles. E.g., 9+19=28. And that seems like the 28 or 24(+4) material forms mentioned in Buddhism.
Book Verifying the Origin of Everything with Binary Mathematical ...
Preston Guynn, Thanks for your comment. I was talking about the "edge of a spherical universe" because I have a mathematical foundation to talk about it. I have explained it is in my research book:
Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
However, there are some things that we can't measure or do experiments on. But we can use mathematical equations to predict their existence. Experimental physics doesn't work all the time, but we can use some experiments to verify other predictions of that theory to verify the consistency (reliability) of that theory.
Best of luck.
See this paper
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357434452_The_fine_structure_constant_in_the_electromagnetic_elementary_particle_model
Manuel Gößling, I guess there is a misunderstanding in the Fine-structure constant on the misrepresentation of the Planck constant in that equation. I guess there is a fundamental reason that can explain the same equation removing the 2π. Then the equation would represent a different Fine-structure constant, but likely it would represent something fundamental. Using h would make change it from 1/137 to 1/22. And the 1/22 looks like a ratio that represents a structure between some real number of elementary particles.
Dear Suresh Wanayalaege , I think a course in elementary arithmetic would be very useful for you. According to you h / ħ = 6.283185311. But even in elementary school it is known that h / ħ = 2π (whatever the non-zero value of h) If you consult the value of π up to the 15 decimal digit you will find: π = 3.141592653589793 so 2π = 6.283185307179586 FOR WHICH THE LAST TWO DECIMAL DIGITS of the value you indicated are WRONG. Also note that (1 / α) = [hc / ke2] / 2π
(k = Coulomb's constant). But hc / ke2 = 861.0225759411367 Dividing this number by 2π you find 1 / α = 137,036. Instead of thinking about magic numbers, study Wanayalaege. You will see that the magic disappears from your head to make way for reality.
Greetings
Giuseppe Pipino