The tragedy of developing countries is that these countries take huge loans to run the country. Then the corrupt leaders there take away money through corruption and invest it in developed countries or deposit it in international banks. But the people here have been bearing the burden of this debt for decades. Because of the countries and international institutions from which loans were taken, the same countries also make the policies of these vulnerable countries. They decide the fate of the people there. Therefore, people suffer inflation in terms of electricity, gas, water, and taxes. Developed countries interfere in developing countries, make policies there, impose corrupt leaders on the people there, and make their lives worse.
To succeed every event pushing the money then things will move.
You can't predict what will happen in the Developing Countries because things are implemented according to the interest of the bureaucracy.
Bureaucracy is the delaying mechanisms to have an apparent or disguise corruption in many offices.
Ignorance is the fate of the poor people, inability to give the money for every issue is the fate of the middle income people in the developing countries.
Inappropriate policies will affect the citizens abruptly and abnormally in many occasions.
Believing trust worthy leaders could be another problems of the people in the developing countries.
Irregular operations, not adhere to rules and regulations, everybody is a king in the developing countries.
In the states, who is responsible for the political leadership of the country? If one follows the classic philosophy of the state, then it is the responsible citizens who determine their political leadership through the democratic mechanisms of a constitutional state. If such a constitutional state has not emerged, but instead an autocratic tyranny has established itself, then ultimately the citizens are also responsible for all the questionable consequences of such a tyranny. Shifting responsibility onto the citizens of other states who, through their alleged political leadership, have established dictatorships in other countries is the old charge against imperialism. Such a direct encroachment on the rights of other states is certainly difficult for the states of the western world to deduce today. However, such an accusation can very well be derived against Russia and China (see e.g. only the examples of Ukraine and Taiwan).
So if you practically hold foreign countries responsible for the corrupt political elites in many developing countries, do you also think that the states responsible in your sense (which of course would have to be named) should eliminate such regimes again? Or would it not be better to mobilize the citizens of such a country themselves to consistently turn against such corrupt elites? In any case, I personally think that the self-responsibility of the citizens is crucial in order to overcome authoritarian-autocratic kleptocracies, which use nothing but criminal strategies of exploitation, with the means of a constitutional state. Unfortunately, this may take a long time, but it is probably the only way to ultimately ensure a peaceful world order.
