The disadvantage of mixed method is a difficult to sell to reviewers of journals, true or false. Explain?
as example. training the reviewer of mixed method design would be costly and time consuming.
Dean Whitehead
Tahsen - in my mind this is 'false'. A well constructed mixed methods study is no more difficult to review than a single qualitative or quantitative study. True - reviewers would have to be knowledgeable and conversant with a wide range of methods and methodologies - both for qualitative and quantitative approaches - but most good quality and established journals request this type of information from reviewers so that mixed method studies can be allocated to those with the skills to review them effectively.
1 votes
1 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Organizational Psychology
- Training
More Dr. Tahsen Alqatawni's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions