25 November 2019 3 5K Report

Dear colleagues,

among other things, in discussions at the American Association for Moral Education Conference in Seattle in 2019, colleagues and I shared the impression that research in social and educational science has lost touch with fundamental theoretical and therefore more explanatory and systematic concepts and approaches, and is becoming more and more of an accumulation of correlations.

We then planned a symposium for the AME Conference 2020, at which, among other things, we want to bring theorists like Habermas, Piaget and Kohlberg back into the game. These, for example, have in our view disappeared unfounded from various research contexts.

In this context, I would like to draw your attention to a current discussion of these theories. These are the central theses of my habilitation (2015). In it I try to integrate the development-theoretical models of Jean Piaget and Lawrence Kohlberg on the basis of a socialization-theoretical and methodological reconstructive (Jürgen Habermas and Ulrich Oevermann) perspective.

Zizek, B. (2018). Tendenzen und Desiderata aktueller Sozialisationsforschung zu Kindheit und Jugend aus der Perspektive einer rekonstruktiven Sozialisationsforschung. In A. Kleeberg-Niepage, & S. Rademacher (Hrsg.), Kindheits- und Jugendforschung in der Kritik. (S. S. 355-388). Wiesbaden: VS.

I am very much looking forward to your impressions and experiences in this matter!

Regards,

Boris

More Boris Zizek's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions