The application of the above is essential in understanding monotheisms, that is their justification and effect on thinking. While believers consider these religions as proven and part of the natural order, I resist these positions and consider that they changed the way people thought.
Ideologies are rarely visible in the ancient world and where they did occur were part of kingly politics, but since the emergence of the three monotheisms the growth of ideologies, particularly political ones, have gained traction. Ideologies I suggest are part of the construction of powerful elites.
Ideology is the language of logic without any science. The failure of it is a grave one and amounts to an ignorance of the dialectic method, which is not just a dialogue, dialogic, erotectic or hypothetical analysis. The obsession with logical form has been all too costly for the science of inference.
Interesting but not sure i completely understand it. Is science really non-ideological?
Ideology, is I presume about imposing a set of values. Ideal ones are just assumptions given knowledge is not a closed book, unless you are a religious fanatic or establishment extremist. My case, which I believe is easily defended by the dialectic, is that partial intelligibility is comprehensive.
A set of values which create some form of action or point of view about the world whereby actions can take place.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics