Suppose I have y = conv (x,h) + n = s +n, where h is channel impulse response with length L and unnormalized. How do I define SNR? Is it SNR = power of x/power of n or SNR = power of s/power of n?
I was wondering this same question a few years ago. I came to a conclusion that the definition depends on your application. In my field of science which is room acoustics, the very first part of the impulse response, say 5 ms after the direct sound, is considered as signal. Then your SNR is "power of conv(x,h(0:5ms)) / (power of noise)". Thus, the rest of the impulse response, i.e., from 5 ms to infinity is considered as convolutive noise and is not presented in the traditional SNR figure. Instead the convolutive noise is presented by another figure called the Direct-to-reverberant ratio (DRR) and it is defined as "power of h(0:5ms) / power of h(5ms:infinity)". Sometimes, in room acoustics, also a parameter called the reverberation time is used as the indication of how much convolutive noise there is, as in
Champagne, B. Bedard, S. ; Stephenne, A "Performance of time-delay estimation in the presence of room reverberation" IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Volume:4 , Issue: 2 , Pages:148 - 152
Normally, the SNR would be characterized in the same manner as the strength of the S and N signals (typically in some sort of dB). Obviously, if the values of S and N are not constant over a given time interval, neither is the SNR. Whether this has perceptual significance depends on how quickly things happen. For example, a very brief duration (e.g.,