Apparently bacterial superinfection translates into worse outcome when a patient is tested positive with SARS-CoV-2 and has developed symptoms. This is especially worrisome as the acquisition of any bacterial superinfection seems to be of higher likeliness in critical ill patients according to the few studies addressing the matter so far. Even more so, when we learn, that patients had acquired a bacterial superinfection despite being prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis with the onset of symptoms! We can also learn from actual data, that bacterial superinfections, occurring under prescription of empiric antibiotic medication, had a higher association with fatal outcome. The findings suggest, that patients had acquired or were colonized with a multi-resistant strain during or even prior to their hospital stay. In current publications addressing the matter, however we learn that only about 30% of the strains where resistant to the antimicrobial therapy administered. We therefore must take into consideration that there is a lack of accumulation of MIC of the antimicrobial in the respective tissue during the course of the illness in the 70% of patients, that had acquired a bacterial superinfection with normal susceptibility of the pathogen to the prescribed antimicrobial. This very scenario is held accountable for the development of resistance mechanisms in endemic pathogens. This might display a potential explanation for the selection of multi-resistant pathogens in the course of SARS-CoV-1. However, the course of SARS-CoV-1 was well controllable at that time. We are facing a different scenario in this ongoing pandemic. Whereas IFR and CFR in COVID-19 remain single digit, the wide use of empiric antibiotic prophylaxis might shift morbidity and mortality by promoting bacterial resistance to other dimensions for all of us in the long run.

More Benito Jonas Baldauf's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions