Teachers can embrace AI tools to save time on routine tasks, but they should do so thoughtfully to avoid diminishing students' critical thinking. The key is to use AI as a support, not a substitute, for deep learning. When integrated strategically, AI can enhance instruction while still fostering independent thought.

Kwan Hong Tan I'm a bit unclear—are there professors who aren't currently using this tool to grade and review student work?

Vira Gorelova I appreciate your balanced view on this—it's exactly the nuance we need. AI, when treated as a support rather than a substitute, can indeed become a powerful ally in education. It can free teachers from repetitive administrative burdens, allowing more energy to be directed toward cultivating deeper student engagement and critical inquiry.

That said, the integration must be intentional. If we're not careful, AI can automate not just tasks, but also thinking patterns—leading students to over-rely on convenience rather than wrestle with complexity. The challenge for educators is to frame AI use in ways that invite reflection, such as prompting students to critique AI-generated content, compare it with human reasoning, or use it as a launchpad for original analysis.

In short, AI can amplify our teaching—but only if we remain clear on what should never be automated: curiosity, discernment, and intellectual struggle.

Jairo Diaz That’s a fair observation! Many professors are already using AI in some capacity—but the key question is how it's used. The goal should be to save time without sacrificing the development of students’ critical thinking. Thoughtful integration makes all the difference.

Adam K Tan