I do not think so, because it is related to the publication and evaluation instructions, the reviewers' curriculum, and the published volumes of the journal annually .....
I do not think all journals should have the same format and submission requirements. I think this will take away creativity as well as what the journal stands for if each journal is going to be the same
The focus and target audience vary from one journal to another. Therefore, the requirements will not be the same. Same formats adherence will take the shine off the standard and reputation of a particular journal and does not pave way for healthy competition. Same response time might be very unrealistic considering the fact that it is greatly determined by reviewers.
A more important issue that follows your question is who would be charge of setting those standards. I don’t see any benefit coming out of such standardization.
Standardization will be of no effect as long as there is no additional benefit to the one who is submitting the article for submission. The uniformity will also take away the diversity that different publishers add to the collection of researchers.