It comes natural for a right handed person to use an exercise book by using it in the custom way. Why are left handed people forced to use the same way when it should be obvious that they should use it and thus write from right to left.
Is it a forced convention that everyone has to write from left to right? In this area of innovation are we forgetting to update and rewire old and painful conventions?
Each language has its own rules, for example, Arabic language is written from right to left and vice versa in English language
Best Regards Holly B. F. Warren
I think it depends on the culture. Many languages are naturally written from right to left. In those languages right handed people write from right to left. Some even write vertically, from top to bottom.
Thanks Andrè
yes I am totally aware of it. What I meant was why doesn't the western world allow left handers to be left handers! What is stopping the recognition that individuals write best when the "line flows naturally"
As a school teacher seeing left handers struggle I have come to think that it is time for innovation even in small apparently menial activities. We correct and set rules for all to enjoy and for a sense of order but at times restricting the easy, enjoyment and inspiration that comes with learning.
Would it be too mind blogging to read some book left to right and others right to left?
Would it not open our mind to new visions and experiences.
Maybe it is not just about culture .....
I agree with Dr. Andre Michaud especially writing not only from left or right to right or left even from top to bottom or vice versa. I found that to be useful in the "metrix mathematics" to develop theoretical physics, which is a connection to language with set theory. This was helpful for me to go from language to logic & logic to language to do nonassumptive mathematical physics. My RESEARCHGATE working papers & the "Modified Maxwell Equations" won't have been all possible without these techniques. Perhaps that might probably gave me an edge over historically other mathematicians & physicists to whom I can't compare myself since my initial knowledge came through materials science only.
Many of recent developments are probably showing that my approach had been ideal to get necessary breakthroughs to grand unify everything quantum relativity. Many theories perhaps grand unified theory developed might possibly be very well gotten discarded. According to me that'ld have been terrible. Though these theories generally known as Einstein quantum GUTS have certain logical holes, these have provided as key puzzle pieces transforming insolvable paradoxes to solvable problems. Metrix theory mathematically that I developed might provide the transitional mathematical theoretical logic to bridge the "gap", not to even mention the possibility of a transform development from mass to time to solve "Yang Mills Millenium problem".
Thank you with your extended expositions to all the way to logical language!!!!!
Dear Rajan,
Please note that I do not have a Doctor's degree. so I do not deserve this title.
Best Regards
André
It seems that multiple perspectives give insights and put us on the threshold of new visions.
Working with young children has shown me, over many years, that perspectives make an enormous difference.
When it comes to writing these down we should maybe allow more flexibility putting emphasis on the flow of ideas rather than on the conventional mode of left to right.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Education