I have a question about how to interpret (differences in) the proportional similarity index Psi proposed by Bolnick et al. (2003) https://search.r-project.org/CRAN/refmans/RInSp/html/PSicalc.html

The question centers on the sensitivity of the index to the number of ‘diet items” that are used by individuals.

I am testing for differences in diet for individuals in a single population, either using ‘ingredients’ as input, or using derived ‘nutrients’ as input. For ‘ingredients’, there are up to 20 different items an individual can consume [e.g. ants, different berries and grains, egg, meat, etc] while ‘nutrients’ are limited to about 5 categories [protein, fat, carbohydrates, fiber, ash].

Are the resulting PSi values comparable? Say that an individual scores Psi = 0.1 based on ingredients but the corresponding nutrient-based Psi = 0.8, can I conclude that an individual acts as a specialist when it comes to ingredients but as a generalist for nutrients?

Or are these scores completely incomparable because of the different number of ‘items’ they are calculated on?

Thanks for any advice,

Diederik

More Diederik Strubbe's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions