Not useful !!!! Not sure but work is being done ...

Eg: Forestry

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425718301548

Remote sensing : http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/5/757

Earthquake assessment : https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5411791/

Other: http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pierm41/02.14073001.pdf

Do you still identify a gap? Can you argue the worth of such study? Will the contribution broaden the frontiers of scientific development?If your answers are credible in all honesty, carry out the study.

If it's mere repetitive study, it will be a waste of resources s OK stop.

Dear Furat,

The project is not practical for the following reasons:

(1) From the same height, you can capture different images have different qualities and shapes of the same region or object.

(zoom the camera)

Mathematically any fixed formula is not well defined for all photos.

(2) Different machines have different capabilities to show the picture

from the same height.

(3) Many physical factors affect the perception, for example, the velocity

of the (portable camera) when it takes the image.

(4) You need to gather all available modern technologies about cameras

some of them are nonpopular and used for military and spy purposes.

I think there are more things make the goal of the project is far to reach.

One more thing, If the used camera is known, then you can show some new results, and the project may be accepted.

Best regards

Dears

Thank you for your replies

just to declare some points

till now my plan is to benefit from the features in the image which will implement to my city (Baghdad) only, the inputs are images taken from google earth without knowing the height.

so according to Mr. Issam comments, the camera now are define

your suggestion, thanks