Isn’t this exactly what you would expect? The intensity distribution is proportional to r^6 or volume^2 and the volume distribution to volume (obviously!).  There’s a 1000-fold difference in scattering intensity and volume between a 10 and 100 nm particle. So (100*0.412)^3/ (10*0.558) ~ 69935/5.58 ~ 12500 times.  So, you’ll not see the larger material in a volume distribution as there's over 12000 times as scattering in the intensity distribution.  In number terms the difference is 10^6.

Thus the intensity distribution is really sensitive to tiny amounts of aggregation or agglomeration in a system which is why protein chemists favor this presentation (as do the international standards: ISO13321:1996; ISO22412:2008; ASTM E2490-09(15))

A little research on this site and on Materials Talks will bring you such gems as:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/DLS_results_give_an_intensity_distribution_a_volume_distribution_and_a_number_distribution_Which_of_these_is_more_important_and_why

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_are_sometimes_the_three_amount_of_intensity_number_volume_in_DLS_equal_in_one_sample

http://www.materials-talks.com/blog/2014/01/23/intensity-volume-number-which-size-is-correct/

http://www.materials-talks.com/blog/2014/07/10/faq-peak-size-or-z-average-size-which-one-to-pick-in-dls/