Pierre de Fermat (1601 –1665) was a French lawyer and an amateur but extraordinarily able mathematician. FLT (Fermat’s Last Theorem) was first conjectured by Pierre de Fermat in 1637 in the margin of a copy of Diophantus' Arithmetica where he claimed he had a proof that was too large to fit in the margin. World of mathematics accepted in1995 Andrew Wiles’ proof by highly complex elliptic mathematical methods for which he has confessed that Fermat couldn’t have that proof at all since some of the mathematics he used was so complex and unavailable at Fermat’s time, concluding that probably Fermat had no proof at all. After 378 years I tried to study and prove FLT by very simple trigonometry and algebra.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278728520_Probably_Also_Fermats_Own_Proof_for_FLT_%28Fermats_Last_Theorem%29
Research Probably Also Fermat’s Own Proof for FLT (Fermat’s Last Theorem)
My related article is a true factual reasoning (which can be called proof / evidence in the everyday language) for the FLT rather than the formal mathematical processes of proof of professional/academic mathematicians. Since Fermat was also an amateur mathematician probably he had found almost similar findings related to my approaches as MPFF & axiom of irrationality leading to state the conjecture as.
" no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than two."
Please note that FLT conjecture states just this !
Who can really read and understand effectively the very complex and abstract elliptic formal proof of AJ.Wiles in 109 pages other than few professional mathematicians probably ? I really wonder !
http://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=7&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CFAQFjAG&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.152.9137%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=H-OFVbaBKIWSsgGxi53wAQ&usg=AFQjCNGbIF7vPJ5iCEzfEww8Sl28OS_S7g
Dear George Stoica
Sir, you probably didn't read some of my previous related articles (total 5) about FLT. I refer to my MPFF model so that works up to infinity. In my MPFF model right angle triangle I give also numerical calculations at at several power(surd) levels and results are all correct numerically as shown by actual Microsoft graphing calculator available in my MPFF article. Please refer to my MPFF if you haven't or browse again. MPFF + Axiom of Irrational numbers shows clearly why FLT is so. " no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than two." Best Regards.
Research Modified Pythagoras and Fermat Formula (MPFF)
Please enjoy an almost a margin proof (please share)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301674377_Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem_Proof_fixed_edition?ev=prf_pub
Data Fermat's Last Theorem (Proof) (fixed edition)
edition error....
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302602715_Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem_Proof_fixed_edition_2?ev=prf_pub
Data Fermat's Last Theorem (Proof) (fixed edition) 2
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics