The neutrino, the photon (gamma just refers to its frequency, that's independent of its charge) and the neutron don't carry electric charge; the neutrino, however, and the neutron do carry weak charge. That's why ``neutral'' doesn't mean anything, without mentioning with respect to which interactions.

There's no such notion as an electrostatic or a magnetic referential, however.

The photon is the particle that mediates the electromagnetic interaction-it just doesn't carry an electric or a magnetic charge itself. That's a property of the electromagnetic interaction, that it's mediated by a particle that's neutral under it.

All this is known, so it would be better to read what's known on this subject,

e.g. https://home.cern/fr/science/physics/standard-model or http://www.cea.fr/multimedia/Documents/infographies/Defis-du-CEA-infographie-modele-standard.pdf before attempting to write essays on it.

absolutely yes

Dear Boubacar Moussa Abdou :

The answer of Stam Nicolis assumes that the SM is correct.

- Neotrons consist of electrically charged particles, so an identical response is impossible for all uncharged particles.

- Photons can split into an electron and a positron (pair production). The assumption of a carged nature is not to be dismissed by hand.

- The future will decide about the theoretically necessary neutrinos.

By the way, the particle image can do without most of the theoretical inventions of the 20th century.

Thesis The Justification of a realistic Picture of Particles and At...

Boubacar Moussa Abdou

The neutron is a composite particle where the components are charged, so it's neutral only at a distance sufficiently big.

The neutrino is a magnetic di-pole and electrically neutral.

The photon has transverse electric and magnetic fields.

JES

follow

Electrostatic neutrality of neutron, gamma ray and neutrino we have, respectively, the charges of elementary particles (1 / 3,2 / 3,1,4 / 3,5 / 3) and as elementary particles (Down quark, Up quark, electron, gamma ray, neutrino). The benchmark used to measure them is, as we will see at the electrostatic poles, the magnetic field lines of the electron. To do this we will take the electron time as a benchmark, using the breaths s1 and s2 here is an explanatory diagram As remarks: The down quark compared to the electron, we have three electron breaths (s1s2s1) which occur when the down quark emits the S1 breath so there is repulsion since the s1 breaths dominate, when the down quark emits the breath S2, the electron emits the breaths (s2s1s2) so there is repulsion because the s2 breath which dominates which means that the electron cannot be in Broglie wave with the Down quark, in addition in this reference the Down quark has a neutral charge, as in the neutron it is the down quark which dominates since there are two of them, so the neutron is neutral. (see attached image file) For the UP quark, the electron emits in three s1s2s1 puffs for two puffs of the UP quark, so there is romance between the UP quark and the electron (except as mentioned above that the spin plane of these particles does not does not allow to evolve into a Broglie wave to form a composite particle), this is why the proton has a charge in the reference frame of the electron since it is the Up quark which dominates in the proton they are two in number . For the gamma ray, the situation is four s1s2s1s2 breaths for three s1s2s1 breaths of the electron so not neither attraction nor repulsion, so that the gamma ray is neutral in the electron frame. For the neutrino, we have five s1s2s1s2s1 blasts including three s1 blasts, for three s1s2s1 electron blasts including two s1 blasts. So the s1 breaths do not dominate so repulsion no attraction so that the neutrino is neutral in the electron frame of reference. However, we note a weak attraction because the occurrence of two breaths of the s1s2 electron corresponds to the occurrence of three breaths of three breaths of the s1s2s1 neutrino so we have an idyll therefore possibility of evolving into a Broglie wave, which gives an explanation to the formation of Muon, Tauon.

We can consider a few points:

Tip one: How does a particle come into being? From ether, from matter or a combination of ether and matter.

Tip Two: Which property of the particle is intrinsic and which is acquired? Mass, charge, spin and such features.

Tip three: What are the types of particles? Particle without internal structure, particle with internal structure.

• Particles may form from ether. So all the properties of particles are derived from ether and are acquired. Here the particles usually have no internal structure.
• Particles may be formed from matter. So many of the properties of particles are inherent. Here, too, particles usually do not have an internal structure.
• Particles may be a combination of matter and ether. So some properties of particles can be acquired. Here the particles usually have an internal structure.

Summary and final comment:

In my opinion, particles are a combination of matter and ether. Features such as mass and charge are inherent and features such as spin are acquired. Most particles have no internal structure (for example, electrons) and some have an internal structure (for example, neutrons, I am still not sure about protons).

So if we consider charge as an intrinsic property of particles, all particles without internal structure have charge, but particles with internal structure can be neutral.

By that conclusion, the neutrino is probably charged and the photon or neutron are neutral. Of course, neutrality can mean that the sum of the positive and negative charges that make it up are equal or in equilibrium.

Science does not know the meaning of particle!

WHAT IS PARTICLE?

The Universe is made of chemical elements, and non-chemical, and both do not act mechanics, both are following their nature.

Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted

regards

Definition of Particle: A material element independent of environmental.

Particles have direct and independent action. Particles can be classified according to their properties.

Definition of matter: It can be part of the environment or a structure composed of particles.

In the material world we have no distinction between chemistry and physics and living and non-living.

Attachment: We usually when we do not know or do not want to know, attribute this to science. Of course, I do not deny the shortcomings of physics and the laziness of physicists.

Elementary particles such as quarks (when they are free), electrons, positrons do not attract each other by means of gravity, because they do not emit a graviton, except quarks when they are in the nucleus where they do not have no kinetic energy, which allows them to emit the graviton (which comes out of the atoms and which causes the atoms to be subjected to gravity). This graviton when the quarks are animated by a kinetic speed turns into a line magnetic field just like those of electrons and positrons which are always animated by a kinetic energy and produce only magnetic field lines. In the classification of elementary particles it is also necessary to take into account the fact that gamma and neutrino particles are particles with charge and not photons of light and that they have a charge (here the only problem and that we measure the electric charge with magnetic field lines from the electron because the magnetic fields of the magnets as well as the electrostatic fields come from those of the electron not from another particle which can lead to confusion about the charge neutrality of the particle gamma and neutrino). the interaction of these particles with gravity is made visible by the nature given to them by waves, in pictorial terms like when a car rolls on blackcurrants, or a boat which sails on waves, the car or the boat are not waves but their trajectories describe that of a wave. if we consider blackcurrant or waves as gravity, we can clearly see that the undulatory nature of these particles is caused by gravity which interacts with their lines of magnetic fields (see Young's slits experiment). In the event of counting of the particles which come out of the slits, the fringes are lost, this is due to the fact that the particles lose the magnetic field lines (in the event of braking or acceleration). and those lines will turn into photons of light. Likewise a photon of light which is like a pipe (in view of its end of line production of magnetic fields) which rolls on itself, the interaction with gravity also gives it a wave nature. see the experiment (Voigt effect) of interaction of light photons with the magnetic field lines of a magnet highlights this pipe shape of the photons which roll, when they meet lines of magnetic fields (they also roast) , they will be deviated from the bottom or the top (if we stand in a horizontal plane) while continuing in the plane parallel to the plane of propagation but not returned (here we can understand why we cannot observe the field lines magnetic and electric) .Idem also in the interaction of two beams of light which meet. the photons roll over each other and continue on their way. On the other hand, an atom is subjected to gravity, but an atom of antimatter is automatically repelled by an atom of matter by means of their gravity, this is the reason why we cannot have molecules made up of atoms. matter and antimatter. A track also to understand why we do not find antimatter made up of atoms in our galaxy.

Les particules élementaires tels que les quarks (quand ils sont libres) , électrons, positrons ne s'attirent pas au moyen de la gravité, car elles n'émttent pas de graviton, sauf les quarks quand ils sont dans le noyau où ils n' ont pas d'énergie cinétiques, ce qui leurs permet d'emettre le graviton (qui sort des atomes et qui fait que les atomes sont soumis à la gravité).Ce graviton quand les quarks sont animés d'une vitesse cinétique se transforme en ligne de champ magnétique tout comme ceux des électrons et positrons qui eux sont toujours animés d'une energie cinétique et ne produisent que des lignes de champ magnétiques. Dans la classication des particules élementaires il faut aussi tenir compte du fait les particules gamma et neutrinos sont des particules avec charge et non des photons de lumiere et qu'ils ont une charge (ici le seul probleme et qu'on mesure la charge électrique avec les lignes de champ magnétiques issues de l'électron car les champs magnétiques des aimants de même que les champs électrostatiques sont issus de ceux de l'électron pas d'une autre particule ce qui peut porter à confusion sur la neutralité de charge de la particule gamma et le neutrino).

l'intéraction des ces particules avec la gravité est rendue visibles par la nature qu'on leurs confere d'ondes, en terme imagé comme quand une voiture roule sur des cassis, ou un bateau qui navigue sur des vagues, la voiture ou le bateau ne sont pas des ondes mais leurs trajectoires décrivent celle d'une onde. si on considere le cassis ou les vagues comme la gravité, on voit bien que la nature ondulatoire de ces particules est caussée par la gravité qui interagit avec leurs lignes de champs magnétiques (voir expérience fentes de Young). En cas de comptage des particules qui sortent des fentes on perd les franges ceci est dû au fait que les particules perdent les lignes de champ magnétiques (en cas freinage ou accélration). et ceux lignes vont se transforment en photons de lumiere.

De même un photon de lumiere qui lui est comme un tuyau ( au vu de sa production bout de ligne de champs magnétique) qui roule sur lui même, l'interaction avec la gravité lui donne une nature ondulatoire aussi. voir l'expérience (effet Voigt) d'interaction des photons de lumiere avec les lignes de champs magnétiques d'un aimant met en évidence cette forme de tuyau des photons qui roulent, quand ils rencontrent des lignes de champs magnétiques (eux aussi rôtent), ils vont être deviés par le bas où le haut (si on se tient dans un plan horizontal) tout en continuant dans le plan parrallèle au plan de propagation mais non retounés (ici on peut comprendre pourquoi on ne peut pas observer les lignes de champs magnétiques et electriques) .Idem aussi dans l'intéraction de deux faisceaux de lumiere qui se rencontrent. les photons roulent les uns sur les autres et continuent leur chemin.

Par contre un atome est soumis à la gravité, mais un atome d'antimatiere est d'office repoussé par un atome de matiere au moyen de leur gravité, c'est la raison pour laquelle on ne peut pas avoir de molécules constituées d'atomes de matiere et d'antimatiere. Une piste aussi pour comprendre pourquoi on ne trouve pas d'antimatiere constituées d'atomes dans notre galaxie.

The key evidence for light waves is the Young’s double-slit interference experiment. After the discovery of the double-slit interference experiment of particles (electrons, etc.), the conclusion of light waves can no longer be established. "Wave-particle duality" denies light as particles because of the wave phenomenon, but recognizes the wave nature of particles. It is better understood that light particles have wave phenomena. Of course, light particle behavior and wave mechanism need new understanding.

https://book4you.org/book/18269199/bf2351

The electric field of an electron has no force on itself, and the field does not exist alone. Photons are electromagnetic particles, and electromagnetic theory is a useful mathematics. Photon is charged and x-ray is positively charged

Article Photon energy and photon behavior discussions