"The Paris Agreement has been hailed as a great success in the fight against climate change. But the focus of national climate plans has been mostly on CO2. Other greenhouse gas emissions are being ignored. In particular, immediate action to cut emissions of four “super pollutants” – ground-level ozone, black carbon, methane and HFCs. Slashing these super pollutants could reduce the rate of warming by as much as 50% in the critical period from today to 2050" Do you agree ? I suggest if forests are saved and replantations done one plant per person making right choice of plants we will save earth ? What is your suggestion ?
Yes I agree and it is very significant issue to have family welfare and family planning uniformly. The population is growing very fast in some areas and still faster in other areas and not growing in some areas This distorted picture is danger to world peace in long run. Climate change should also address population growth control in some way or the other globally. But in the present context immediate concern should be to grow more trees and raise forests and address all other problems on urgent basis.
Yes Many countries have signed the agreement without giving any thought how the commitment will be fulfilled. Such meeting do not have scientists from different areas and commitments made at political level need to be supported by scientific knowledge possibilities and realities in real times. I appreciate your concern and its real threat to global peace and stability . Climate change needs stability of population growth I appreciate your point fully Mr Kenneth M Towe.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biota
- Eukaryota
- Viridiplantae
- Streptophyta
- Plants