In developed countries, many institutions and labs have funding mechanisms or agreements to support open access (OA) publishing. However, challenges still exist beyond the financial aspect. For example:
Lab-Level Inequality: Large, well-funded labs can publish regularly in OA journals, while smaller labs or individual researchers may still struggle, even in wealthy countries.
Discipline Gaps: Some fields receive more OA support (e.g., biomedical sciences), while others (e.g., social sciences, veterinary sciences) may not benefit equally from institutional agreements.
Administrative Burden: Applying for APC waivers, handling paperwork, or navigating institutional agreements often takes significant time from researchers.
Career Impact: Early-career researchers in labs with limited OA support may find themselves disadvantaged compared to peers in bigger labs that can afford frequent OA publications.
Collaborative Issues: In multi-country projects, researchers from developed countries often push for OA publishing, but collaborators from developing countries may face difficulties covering shared costs.
👉 Questions for discussion:
How do labs in developed countries manage OA publishing costs and agreements—are smaller labs at a disadvantage?
Do institutional “big deals” (like transformative agreements) actually reduce inequality within countries, or do they mainly benefit large universities?
How do researchers balance OA publishing with lab budgets for experiments, equipment, or fieldwork?
Should funding agencies tie research grants more directly to OA publishing support?